S&S vs. SF in BotNS

Gerry Quinn · 22 Dec 2011, 18:11 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:11:18 -0000
Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS
In-Reply-To: <4EF36AB3.4040606 at verizon.net>
References: <CAJ8=rtgkeuxRg6cp_71YmYdWdayw1DAkNY+yGsXs=qBwXHcRWA at mail.gmail.com><2D86F6ABA9A64B2CA745901811F86471@Rover><CAJ8=rtiMBWKQi-3Yb8uq9K5ntxaT4E61L3jkCRKwtuWNcG9kVw at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EF36AB3.4040606 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <C68271F0222A4F0E9DACA5ECDFBF5264@Rover>



From: David Stockhoff 


On 12/22/2011 11:47 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:


> Face it, despite the theology, souls are not things we can pin down with 
> certainty. Famously, cows were judged to have souls in the Middle Ages, 
> but are no longer considered to have them. Science changes its mind too, 
> but in this case presumably the Church changed its mind.

I thought the thinking was that animals do have souls, but not immortal ones.
- Gerry Quinn
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111222/4b2189d7/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net