Urth Net

← back to the conversation

S&S vs. SF in BotNS

David Stockhoff · 22 Dec 2011, 20:27 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:27:04 -0500
Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rth33ZvVDvO7kS5-httQOkA9aOYbq9z=eKzYHEfCm8quew at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ8=rtgkeuxRg6cp_71YmYdWdayw1DAkNY+yGsXs=qBwXHcRWA at mail.gmail.com>
	<2D86F6ABA9A64B2CA745901811F86471@Rover>
	<CAJ8=rtiMBWKQi-3Yb8uq9K5ntxaT4E61L3jkCRKwtuWNcG9kVw at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EF36AB3.4040606 at verizon.net>	<C68271F0222A4F0E9DACA5ECDFBF5264@Rover>
	<CAJ8=rth33ZvVDvO7kS5-httQOkA9aOYbq9z=eKzYHEfCm8quew at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EF39298.8020604 at verizon.net>

On 12/22/2011 1:14 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> Gerry Quinn wrote:
>
>> I thought the thinking was that animals do have souls, but not immortal
>> ones.
> Depends on who's doing the thinking.
>
> Aquinas, for example, somewhat-following Aristotle, believed that
> souls came in three varieties:
>
> The _vegetable_ soul, which gives life and the power of growth and reproduction.
> The _animal_ soul, which gives the power of movement.
> And the _rational_ soul, which gives the power of, well, reason.
>
> In Aquinas' schema, only humans have all three souls -- angels do not
> have the first two but are pure rational soul.

Now THAT'S food for thought, in the context of Long Sun.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net