S&S vs. SF in BotNS

António Pedro Marques · 23 Dec 2011, 15:24 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:24:44 +0000
Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS
In-Reply-To: <4EF495C8.90405 at hyraxes.com>
References: <SNT123-W6264EC536A69C6A6153331CFAA0 at phx.gbl><4EF414CF.3000700 at clueland.com>
	<4EF462C8.909 at gmail.com> <6850562C3B1A4D9BA2DED54E5910C581@Rover>
	<4EF495C8.90405 at hyraxes.com>
Message-ID: <4EF49D3C.4090605 at gmail.com>

Dave Lebling wrote (23-12-2011 14:52):
> http://blogearth.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/electron-filmed-for-the-first-time/
>
> I have seen a photo of an electron. The link above is one of many that will
> enable you to see one for yourself.

No, you haven't seen a photo of an electron, nor will the link above allow 
you to.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net