S&S vs. SF in BotNS

David Stockhoff · 23 Dec 2011, 17:56 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:56:48 -0500
Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS
In-Reply-To: <4EF4BA11.1030302 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W21DC1BC9239C77F928E875CFAB0 at phx.gbl>
	<4EF4AA10.6070503 at hyraxes.com> <4EF4ADCB.4080503 at verizon.net>
	<4EF4AEAF.6070605 at gmail.com> <4EF4BA11.1030302 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EF4C0E0.6000409 at verizon.net>

On 12/23/2011 12:27 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote (23-12-2011 16:39):
>> David Stockhoff wrote (23-12-2011 16:35):
>>> If you can't tolerate doubt, either source of authority will serve.
>>> That's what Lee's on about.
>>
>> And authority is what so many people are looking for. Those aren't 
>> usually
>> the people who contribute.
>
> ...contribute to Humankind, not the list, of course.

OH! Thanks for the clarification.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net