The Wizard

Daniel Petersen · 02 Mar 2012, 19:15 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com (Daniel Petersen)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:15:38 +0000
Subject: (urth) The Wizard
In-Reply-To: <4F51190B.9070809 at verizon.net>
References: <CAM0v-i7_2yU6rFZNkkqJK6Q6M6kLJZdSgSSa3Jsg4fmCmgrKNQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ64fMX_Eqi=EoaUPrKLwjxh0F-WDH3FHj=4uKhX3-4Saw at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i5cikfR16r_5GpExRNNKVhun+EzkbcpNQcx0dXUhLiDSg at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F4C8E83.8070604 at gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ7mqaSgXO-N38XO77NcKMb5dpar4FT8oJ1wS35Hsp61=Q at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F4D0AE4.1090400 at gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ62Aaqsn3ozB52DBSgA=sWb4rVgNLQwFCGE9wgSoh6=jw at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F503016.3040201 at gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ404sbQHEJO5E-ymsXA5=q1QqcUaA+gtjvaVABqGiG87g at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F50F426.5030604 at gmail.com>
	<BB3DE4C57B2B4D88976C7FCF22D5D9F4@Rover>
	<4F511556.9030105 at gmail.com> <4F51190B.9070809 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <CAGB0RZ7wAQgXDDF3GPrp0+YmkX+f9DgXu-WUeMwe-Fz4ExJ89w at mail.gmail.com>

well, hard-headed, certainly...

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:01 PM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>wrote:

>
>     /al?lu?sion//??lo?oZH?n/
>
> Noun:
>
> 1. Any reference not spelled out or mentioned concretely in a text but
>   which inattentive and forgetful people insist on reading
>   nevertheless, because they are so confused they forget what book
>   they are reading and thus what book they are /not /reading.
> 2. The practice of making arguments to such references, esp. as an
>   attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of hard-headed realists who
>   know better.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/2/2012 1:45 PM, James Wynn wrote:
>
>> Look up the term "allusion".
>>
>> On 3/2/2012 11:01 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>>
>>> In fact, ?Silent Silk? and ?Silver Silk? are clearly explained in the
>>> text. The claimed association with Dionysus is based on some syllables of
>>> the eponyms resembling syllables in the names of two fauns, one of whom was
>>> associated with Dionysus, and neither of whom is mentioned anywhere in the
>>> text.
>>> Wolfe isn?t ?riffing hard? on Dionysus, IMO. Some people are stretching
>>> hard on Dionysus.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120302/0a4daffc/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net