The Wizard
Mo Holkar · 07 Mar 2012, 19:34
· from 2012-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: lists at ukg.co.uk (Mo Holkar) Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:34:44 +0000 Subject: (urth) The Wizard In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W561DC7C70AEB9E060043DECF560 at phx.gbl> References: <SNT123-W561DC7C70AEB9E060043DECF560 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <265685.91989.qm at smtp830.mail.ird.yahoo.com> At 18:12 07/03/2012, Lee wrote: >No offense taken, Daniel. I am more concerned that I have offended your >beliefs, which I did not intend to do. Still, you might correctly infer >from my name that I was raised in the jewish faith and have read the Old >Testament both in English and Hebrew. I am confortable with my understanding >of its meaning and original intent. > >As Christians are most focused on the gospels of the NT, so jews are focused >on the Pentateuch. I think you would have to be selective and blinkered to >read it and NOT see the war, genocide and paganistic trappings found among >the ancient Hebrews and their God. > >Now if you are suggesting that God is more mellow and peaceful in the later >prophet books than He is in Genesis and Exodus I would agree. This supports >my thesis that this is an evolving God. Maybe I'm reading you wrongly, but you seem to be tacitly assuming that the various books are accurate descriptions of God as manifest at the time of writing? I have a different assumption, which is that the various books are testament not to the nature of God, but to human perception of God -- ie. it is that perception that evolves, not the nature of God itself (which might be eternal, for all we can tell for sure). It seems to me sensible to recognize the books as the historical documents that they are ? many composed long after the events that they depict (some of which events didn't actually happen) ? and as witnesses of human striving to understand the nature of the Divine, rather than as faithfully documenting its workings. best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net