The Wizard

António Pedro Marques · 11 Mar 2012, 01:39 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:39:02 +0000
Subject: (urth) The Wizard
In-Reply-To: <CAGB0RZ5tgJHe8b-GyQ6Ympn0-p-WS3tYmi6jA5T95Z8Ktf3DQQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W39083F005BF6D6A83513B5CF570 at phx.gbl>
	<CAGB0RZ5XbErZuHvf=m3y_FbBqbTiQTgsibTST92t5Lw1rD79hg at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F58EF64.7030008 at gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ5tgJHe8b-GyQ6Ympn0-p-WS3tYmi6jA5T95Z8Ktf3DQQ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F5C0236.6040505 at gmail.com>

Daniel Petersen wrote (08-03-2012 20:07):
> Hey, I thought you didn't want to discuss this! :)

Yep. Now I should be writing a lengthy reply, because the issues you raised 
deserve it, but I have no time so I'll just have to be succint and not enter 
into them.

> The *larger* summary of the doctrine of God from the entire OT could not
> possibly be accurately represented by a summary of the (alleged) doctrine of
> God one garners merely from the orders to exterminate the Canaanites (...)

Notice I said:

'The key word is *summary*. Otherwise there's just no way to go around all 
the clear, insistent and absolute *orders* to fully exterminate the Canaanites.'

I meant two things here:

1. It's unsophisticated because/if it's a *summary*.
2. The violence in the first books of the OT just can't be glossed over. 
Those of us who stand by the whole canon should be ready to defend it with 
more than just saying the people who wrote it were savages.

A point I didn't make, but I think one of you Danielses invited it: no 
amount of descriptions of ????? as merciful can make up for actions by him 
which seem to contradict it. Other things may, but not simple adjectives. 
Adjectives are cheap. Istr a passage (in Exodus?) where, a little after some 
egregiously violent bit (or a recollection of one), ????? refers to himself 
as slow to anger and quick to forgive. That just won't do in its face. In my 
opinion it doesn't work for the Qur'an, so it doesn't work for the Bible 
either. We must be able to defend God better than that. I think we can. I 
don't think we work hard enough.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net