The Wizard

Daniel Petersen · 11 Mar 2012, 01:55 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com (Daniel Petersen)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:55:21 +0000
Subject: (urth) The Wizard
In-Reply-To: <4F5C0236.6040505 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W39083F005BF6D6A83513B5CF570 at phx.gbl>
	<CAGB0RZ5XbErZuHvf=m3y_FbBqbTiQTgsibTST92t5Lw1rD79hg at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F58EF64.7030008 at gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ5tgJHe8b-GyQ6Ympn0-p-WS3tYmi6jA5T95Z8Ktf3DQQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F5C0236.6040505 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGB0RZ6vNrQA94RP+qm3icm9thsHsiVXQqevisLjzUHdY5jPNw at mail.gmail.com>

'Those of us who stand by the whole canon should be ready to defend it with
more than just saying the people who wrote it were savages.'

I tried to take a tentative stab at that in my earlier comments.

 'no amount of descriptions of ????? as merciful can make up for actions by
him which seem to contradict it. Other things may, but not simple
adjectives. '

I believe I said God's mercy in the OT was emphasised continually by both
ascription *and* actions.  And, frankly, the ascriptions DO matter very
much in the way the Bible works, I think.  But yes, they are always
accompanied by their embodiment in divine action.  I would begin by
pointing to the mercifully active CONTEXT that surrounds the Canaanite
massacre and so on.  That is, the grace of CREATION itself (and again I
emphasise that the opening chapters of Genesis portray a mighty AND
amazingly near, gracious, gentle, patient Creator - and just the sheer joy
and goodness in the very creation itself reflecting God's worthiness to be
praised and trusted.  But also the divine compassion toward and rescue of
the Israelites (which I already pointed to).  Furthermore, there is the
plan for redemption of all humanity that unfolds from the earliest moments
and then right through.  These strike me as FAR more fundamental to a good
reading of the Bible's own doctrine of God than incidences of 'genocide'
and so on (which I certainly never said needed to be glossed over - indeed,
I tried briefly to take a direct look at them and reason from my premises
of God's goodness as to how to understand them in that framework).

Good thoughts, Antonio.

-DOJP

2012/3/11 Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>

> Daniel Petersen wrote (08-03-2012 20:07):
>
>> Hey, I thought you didn't want to discuss this! :)
>>
>
> Yep. Now I should be writing a lengthy reply, because the issues you
> raised deserve it, but I have no time so I'll just have to be succint and
> not enter into them.
>
>  The *larger* summary of the doctrine of God from the entire OT could not
>> possibly be accurately represented by a summary of the (alleged) doctrine
>> of
>> God one garners merely from the orders to exterminate the Canaanites (...)
>>
>
> Notice I said:
>
> 'The key word is *summary*. Otherwise there's just no way to go around all
> the clear, insistent and absolute *orders* to fully exterminate the
> Canaanites.'
>
> I meant two things here:
>
> 1. It's unsophisticated because/if it's a *summary*.
> 2. The violence in the first books of the OT just can't be glossed over.
> Those of us who stand by the whole canon should be ready to defend it with
> more than just saying the people who wrote it were savages.
>
> A point I didn't make, but I think one of you Danielses invited it: no
> amount of descriptions of ????? as merciful can make up for actions by him
> which seem to contradict it. Other things may, but not simple adjectives.
> Adjectives are cheap. Istr a passage (in Exodus?) where, a little after
> some egregiously violent bit (or a recollection of one), ????? refers to
> himself as slow to anger and quick to forgive. That just won't do in its
> face. In my opinion it doesn't work for the Qur'an, so it doesn't work for
> the Bible either. We must be able to defend God better than that. I think
> we can. I don't think we work hard enough.
> ______________________________**_________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120311/ba79e80e/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net