Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Saint Catherine and the Nature of the Flood

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 14 Mar 2012, 21:37 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:37:30 -0700
Subject: (urth) Saint Catherine and the Nature of the Flood
In-Reply-To: <CALvaXC9Bg7Wz90M9JNK9MEinpebXh1KF5mwbXgVG0XfY6RNkgQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALvaXC9Bg7Wz90M9JNK9MEinpebXh1KF5mwbXgVG0XfY6RNkgQ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtjwBpd3VwEZmuArih15pGbBEQhNtO-8Av0nVpgfOG72yA at mail.gmail.com>

Hi, Jordon. Good to "see" you.

Jordon Flato wrote:

> If the guild of torturers practices a rite central to their mythology and
> close to the very nature of their order, a rite which involves a character
> named Catherine who's story we can easily and readily track to the real and
> actual Saint Catherine of our world, doesn't that strongly indicate the
> presence, in the distant past of Urth, of a real Christianity? ?The very
> existence of saints, and of this one in with details so similar to the
> details of the story we know of Saint Catherine, seems to beg the question
> for me. ?How could you have her story without having first had Christ? ?What
> sorts of 'close but not identical' circumstances could have existed to give
> rise to this exceptionally similar story to our own?
>
> Is this simply a function and artifact of the translation gimmick?

I'm inclined to think so -- indeed, the translator seems to substitute
saints' names for whatever past/future terminology people of the
Commonwealth use to name themselves. (And it won't do to say that
those names are direct; look how much the names of well-known saints
have changed in common usage after just two thousand years: e.g.,
Cephas --> Petrus --> Peter.)

The concept of saints isn't intrinsically Christian, either; Buddhism
has something that we translate as "Buddhist saints."

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net