True Confession?

Alex David Groce · 05 Nov 1999, 12:56 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce at gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) True Confession?
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 12:56:46
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0387 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0387.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, Severian TELLS us he's a liar, etc.  But I'm still unclear about what
you and Clute think he's lying about in a major way--Wolfe's narrators are,
in my opinion, for the most part unreliable in not giving the whole truth,
but only part of it.  I really can't think of any instances (other than thi=
ngs
that are just odd--who said what on page #1) where Severian outright lies.
Of course, if he's lying consistently, there's no way we can tell--but that
undermines the entire narrative, and also (to me) seems out of whack with
Severian's role as bringer of the New Sun (unless we're to doubt that, too).
The minor oddities--well, Severian may be lying about who was at the gate, =
but
WHY?  It's a very strange thing to (baldly) lie about, since it seems to ha=
ve
no real importance.  I think Severian lies to other people in the narrative,
but other than dodging the uncomfortable is reasonably honest (given that e=
ven
perfect memory cannot grant him complete understanding of his own story) to
US.  Anyway, I've always felt that Severian was writing has narrative more =
for
himself than for others--his slinging them into the Seas of Time is a roman=
tic
gesture, but he's amazingly lucky that they ended up in Mr. Wolfe's back ya=
rd.
:)  In which case he may state things that are not completely true (his
claim that Jolenta & Dorcas were sexually involved) but these are the self-
deceptions that the non-Divine are prone to (and Severian, despite his post-
human state at the end of Urth is still clearly not Divine).  In this sense,
ALL narrators are liars.

I think Severian's sometimes stingy with facts, but that the hypothesis tha=
t=20
he's a serious liar is the quick path to total literary solipsism.

By the way, I noticed this past week that Ask and Embla are mentioned in C.=
 S.=20
Lewis' PERELANDRA--I wonder if that sparked their inclusion in Wolfe (we kn=
ow
he's read Lewis).  The whole Lewis trilogy has an interesting feel compared=
 to
Wolfe--I think the visions of the cosmos in it are actually more similar th=
an
might be thought to Wolfe's in BOTNS--Lewis is just vastly less subtle about
it.

Natural theology, at least to the extent that God's existence is knowable f=
rom
observation of the natural world and the application of reason, is, if not a
declared item of the faith, at least standard Catholic theology (ob: Aquina=
s).
On the other hand, Silk's experience in Long Sun is a direct revelation, and
so cannot be reasoned from natural experience.

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu)
Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department
8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net