The Perils of Partnership

Matthew Weber · 22 Mar 2012, 16:44 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: palaeologos at gmail.com (Matthew Weber)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:44:23 -0700
Subject: (urth) The Perils of Partnership
In-Reply-To: <4F6B54EB.3010504 at clueland.com>
References: <CAC1m3Sd=1ruN4en43y2kytaGjsJSO7Vw5=POJaPqWp-eRbudFQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F6B50C4.4030000 at clueland.com>
	<CAMavq5OjF19u2hY97AjrnJ4XM6K4_1pGEKymp1MYpcGnpBn1Zw at mail.gmail.com>
	<4F6B54EB.3010504 at clueland.com>
Message-ID: <CAMavq5POw3uMJ1s_LDfDhKGNc-w0WgS6kioWeiVfrqrbPqsq+g at mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at clueland.com> wrote:

> On 3/22/2012 11:23 AM, Matthew Weber wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at clueland.com
>> <mailto:jwilson at clueland.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    On 3/22/2012 10:35 AM, Fred Kiesche wrote:
>>
>>        Annoyed as they are all ex-library books: which the Amazon
>>        "partner" did
>>        not mention in his/her description. I did not pay a lot, and
>>        these are
>>        all fine "reading copies", but given a choice between a
>>        ex-library book
>>        with stickers, mylar wrap and stamps and things inside...and a
>>        actual
>>        "new" copy without any of that, I'll choose the new one.
>>        Am I a cranky book collector or what?
>>
>>
>>    Were they sold as new, or "as good as new" condition? If you bought
>>    books listed under the "used" tab, you could do a lot worse.
>>
>> Jeff, a book sold in "good" or higher condition should not be defaced.
>> A book with stamps, labels, and pasted-in card holders is "fair"
>> condition at best.
>>
>
>
> If it's sold as a collectable, sure. As used retail merchandise, the
> standards are lower. I admit the lines are blurred somewhat by the market's
> barriers to entry being lowered to the point where it's gainful to deal in
> single used items online.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/**offer-listing/B0062IGP0S/sr=/**
> qid=/ref=olp_tab_used?ie=UTF8&**coliid=&me=&qid=&sr=&seller=&**
> colid=&condition=used<http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0062IGP0S/sr=/qid=/ref=olp_tab_used?ie=UTF8&coliid=&me=&qid=&sr=&seller=&colid=&condition=used>
>
> Was it under the "collectible" or the "used" tab, Fred?
>
>
>
Whether collectible or used doesn't really matter, I think.  Under IOBA
standards, anything that's ex-library *must* be flagged as such :
http://www.ioba.org/pages/resources/condition-definitions/

-- 
Matt +

Give a sop to Cerberus.
    Greek and Roman saying
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120322/eda9f4db/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net