Urth Net

← back to the conversation

This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires

Antonin Scriabin · 10 Apr 2012, 15:31 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: kierkegaurdian at gmail.com (Antonin Scriabin)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:31:31 -0400
Subject: (urth) This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires
In-Reply-To: <CAGUyZEd_f6CRjc7ctO3CtW+JeCLrYU0=F4j2NCzRrKTAyfvMqg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F841CE1.8090902 at verizon.net>
	<1334064915.84104.YahooMailClassic at web161803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAGUyZEd_f6CRjc7ctO3CtW+JeCLrYU0=F4j2NCzRrKTAyfvMqg at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM0v-i7VQ5Nfsd6U0CQ+1E3c+fMw9yqFtFWzLX87VFuxvzmhGQ at mail.gmail.com>

I think critiquing the book for not having social networking is incredibly
silly.  Science fiction authors are in the business of going out on a limb
to tell a story; they routinely break the rules, and generally are free to
create their worlds however they see fit.  It is petty and close-minded to
begrudge the exclusion of Twitter.  How can this not be a troll?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Knight <jacobeiserman at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>> This reactive "everything must be sound and free from all
>> stereotyping/common fears relating to a belief system so that no one may be
>> offended" makes for some bland, boring, and uninteresting fiction.
>
>
> That's not my position, at least--as I said earlier, I think Wolfe is a
> good enough writer that you don't need to agree with his political leanings
> (which are generally understated, and much more complex than bald
> conservatism) to appreciate him.  But while I often come across statements
> that disagree with me almost on a visceral level in my reading, this is the
> first time in a while that it's happened with a writer that I love and
> respect as much as Wolfe.  And when it's something like this, which
> connects with my daily life, it is hard to bracket myself out of the
> equation.  I doubt I'm the only one in this position.  Whatever...I'm still
> enjoying the book.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120410/0f444867/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net