This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires

David Stockhoff · 11 Apr 2012, 11:45 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:45:09 -0400
Subject: (urth) This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires
In-Reply-To: <CAGUyZEdEHR8tMmHO2BhQWi+rAD=1uMzQsN0Qs4KDqzwf5vMQ5Q at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMwAopTghPLLAW+4rLYg0bZAG_R=mJwhuQ2oRynSqYEsXqGoaQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+Z2yj2qe9dosBoCOqcAu-BOWa5F-+9FenDN6b_2iUYOqKsc_A at mail.gmail.com>
	<0FFB1F1E-6AFC-449A-B6A6-7B4AE2E0D0E9 at gmail.com>
	<CAGUyZEdEHR8tMmHO2BhQWi+rAD=1uMzQsN0Qs4KDqzwf5vMQ5Q at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F856EC5.3070404 at verizon.net>

On 4/11/2012 12:15 AM, Matthew Knight wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com 
> <mailto:entonio at gmail.com>>
>
>
>     Only someone who thinks sharia has no business in Europe can
>     consider that the mention of sharia in Europe is objectionable
>     politics. Who's the xenophobe then? One might as well ask what
>     effect does a protagonist being black has on a story written by a
>     white author, and leap to the conclusion that the author is a
>     white supremacist who's subtly complaining that blacks may one day
>     be protagonists of something.
>
>
> Sorry, this doesn't ring true.  Sharia isn't just "mentioned" here, 
> but framed in a specific way.  The kind of sharia we are presented 
> with is far from the kind which has gone into effect in parts of the 
> UK.  Rather than that form, restricted to certain issues of family law 
> and civil disputes over things like inheritance, we are presented with 
> sharia-as-bogeyman, where theft results in severed limbs, and 
> (probably) blasphemy of the prophet or adultery lead to death by 
> stoning.  Sharia law is about much more than violent punishment, but 
> it's not usually presented with nuance in the West, including in this 
> book.  At least, the part I've read thus far.

I almost posted the same response. A tiny and backward part of sharia is 
used as a bogeyman, whereas 99% of the time it's as dull as dishwater. 
And amputation is presented not as chance or opinion, but as fact. I 
don't see any purpose for depicting the protagonist as a misinformed 
crank, even if he's as much antihero as hero, so it probably should be 
taken as true and as a plain extension of "today's headlines" into Tomorrow.

The question is, which headlines? Hint: There is no Wolf News channel.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net