This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires

David Stockhoff · 12 Apr 2012, 20:11 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:11:25 -0400
Subject: (urth) This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires
In-Reply-To: <4F872350.6050208 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W506412ECA023405E80C7BCCF3A0 at phx.gbl>
	<4F871EF9.3050207 at verizon.net> <4F871FF5.9010202 at gmail.com>
	<4F872197.3030304 at verizon.net> <4F872350.6050208 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F8736ED.5000408 at verizon.net>

On 4/12/2012 2:47 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> David Stockhoff wrote (12-04-2012 19:40):
>> On 4/12/2012 2:33 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>
>>> All we know about prisons we learned from Oz.
>>
>> That explains a lot about you, Antonio. Please excuse me from your "we,"
>>  since I never saw it.
>
> If you never saw it, what can you know about what it explains or not?

This makes no sense.
>
>> I prefer reading about scientific and legal studies of issues rather 
>> than
>> TV shows about them. Perhaps as a result, I don't say "I don't care at
>> all what happens to murderers."
>
> It's more fashionable not to care about innocents, n'est-ce pas? For 
> sure it's grounded on a vast amount of science.

This makes no sense either. Did someone express such a sentiment?

Recently you asked someone if he read what you wrote. Did you read what 
I wrote?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net