Urth Net

← back to the conversation

This Week in Google Alerts: R.A. Lafferty

Daniel Petersen · 17 Apr 2012, 15:47 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com (Daniel Petersen)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:47:49 +0100
Subject: (urth) This Week in Google Alerts: R.A. Lafferty
In-Reply-To: <1334675594.95733.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <CAGB0RZ7UiWMRspR8c-XiOTTY5xuS6D--F1Td_-CAQ1CxrtqtPA at mail.gmail.com>
	<1334675594.95733.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAGB0RZ5yLD9BYEEZfLbhhn9FNw2Q_6Am3N02eRV3NV2eP+0EWQ at mail.gmail.com>

Heh, heh, knew I'd raise some hackles.  I totally agree that Wolfe is the
more disciplined writer (*maybe* also more consistent) - it's just that
Lafferty's fiction, at its best, speaks forth like something primal - his
main roots are oral and I think that might be what makes the main
difference - that being the voice for his wildly unbelievable and amazing
worldview.  Also, though, the more you read him the more you realise the
INCREDIBLE verbal control he often has - his best fiction is very tight and
disciplined and exquisitely well honed and crafted - really surpassing the
best of Wolfe I think.  Wolfe definitely considered himself a significant
step below Laff.  However, I have no qualms with people thinking them equal
or reversed.  I can't expect everyone to have the gifted insight into
literature I (and Wolfe) possess.

-DOJP
:)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> --- On *Tue, 4/17/12, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com>*wrote:
>
>
>
> And Tim Powers, two steps below Laff literarily, and ONE BELOW Wolfe, I
> think is very worth checking out for another highly original Catholic
> writer of wonderfully bizarre fiction.
>
> -DOJP
>
> Oh my! Well, I will admit Lafferty is a genius, but his failure to sustain
> a long narrative of such consistently high quality definitely leads me to
> the opinion that Wolfe is the more disciplined and consistent writer.
> Perhaps some of his stylistic explorations were more mundane, but
> ...........
>
> okay, different strokes for different folks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120417/19535ef7/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net