Long Sun Worth it?

Peter Westlake · 09 Nov 1999, 11:09 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Peter Westlake <peter at harlequin.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) Re:Long Sun Worth it?
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 11:09:48 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0439 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0439.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 22:37 1999-11-08 EST, Patri10629 at aol.com wrote:
>The question baffles me. Alga's initial dismay baffles me. But, I am, in=20
>general baffled:)

I had the same reaction as alga in the very beginning; I think it's
because of the very simple and direct style of writing, and the
bright colours (1). The initial feel is rather like a comic book (2);
it reminded me strongly of _Castleview_ in that respect (3). Only after
reading for a while and *observing*, watching the events unfold
and picking up impressions of Silk's character from his actions (4),
does the quality of the writing become clear. Not a comic, but
a stained glass window.

1) I'm sure colours are important, but being only a Bear I can't
recall the details without going home and looking them up. Let's
think: the main appearances of Blue and Green are obvious, so I
started looking for Red. There's Blood, and Rose, and probably
others. Then there was the orangey colour of the scarf, and I
have a feeling yellow turned up too, but that might just have
been the (erroneous) colour of the sky on the covers (5).

2) I know there are literary comics, but those aren't the ones I mean.

3) Likewise, no disrespect to _Castleview_. We must have another
go at that some time! I actually understood one or two bits last
time I read it.

4) No-one ever *tells* us a thing about Silk, but we come to know
him very well from seeing his actions and hearing his words. This
ought to be the textbook example for "show, don't tell". It's a
towering literary achievement, a real tour de force. It also
explodes utterly the common belief that it's impossible to make
a "good" character interesting.

5) The British editions had stained glass windows on the spines,
and to begin with they joined up into a bigger picture. But then
two of them repeated and stopped joining up. Was this just a bug,
or couldn't they afford any more artwork, or what?

>Yes, read it. It is yummy and good for you.

So it is. I've read the first book several times now, having
started again every time another book came out, but I can't
imagine ever tiring of it.

Spectacled Bear.

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net