If I already like ...

Rebecca Bushong-Taylor · 18 Apr 2012, 04:07 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rebeccabt01 at gmail.com (Rebecca Bushong-Taylor)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:07:56 -0400
Subject: (urth) If I already like ...
In-Reply-To: <1334719652.72197.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <4F8E135C.1040004 at hyraxes.com>
	<1334719652.72197.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAMXHMWGmGRv1-EPkTAh3m4yJa26Sz+MXyznafr-AL1LOD=sbBQ at mail.gmail.com>

I'm usually far too intimidated by this august group to include anything,
but if you are a Lafferty fan you might also enjoy Howard Waldrop.  Mostly
short stories, quirky and some quite funny.  I believe he and Gene are
friends.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com>wrote:

>
>
> --- On *Tue, 4/17/12, Dave Lebling <dlebling at hyraxes.com>* wrote:
>
>
>
> At this point I'm reminded of Neal Stephenson as well. The Baroque Cycle
> is rather Wolfean and Powersian, in my opinion, infodumps aside.
>
> I believe there's a big difference between the people who like Wolfe (and
> Lewis, Tolkien, and some others) largely because their work is heavily
> influenced by their Catholicism, and those who like Wolfe because of his
> pre-post-modern-ish (to coin a phrase) sensibility. I'm one of the latter,
> although the Catholicism works fine for me as a background.
>
> Dave Lebling
>
>
> I am sure the Catholicism contributes to the baroque spirituality that I
> so admire - though I find him almost entirely (but VERY cryptically and
> elusively) modernist in outlook.  (I fervently believe in almost every case
> there IS  a bottom to get to - something I would abandon in an author  who
> I felt was being deliberately "postmodern").
>
> I love his prose and his creations and his mysteries, and I tell myself it
> is for that reason that I rank him at the pinnacle of all artists, in this
> or any time, and that everything that comes after will surely be a pale
> shadow, as everything that came before was just a fleeting glimpse of
> promise.  Yet it might very well be that my basic spiritual but eccentric
> and pragmatic "ends justify the means" conservatism is what really makes me
> put him far above the other authors I admire - that the arguments of his
> characters speak to me in particular.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120418/15b59b96/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net