Urth Net

← back to the conversation

If I already like ...

DAVID STOCKHOFF · 18 Apr 2012, 15:04 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (DAVID STOCKHOFF)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) If I already like ...
In-Reply-To: <4F8EAF80.1090208 at clueland.com>
References: <CAM0v-i6sQD9VrGyrXFr1GUKn2aRoV8kFJWompTiUgmNhzqrccg at mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvaXC9GQqbm6REWfHa+HFqUHFe_M7Jw=3i+keiag4kpshUZbA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i5ckuzCETcOVTWzJk_gwZjAt7R24GQNGjRPERCo54UsYQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<1334689683.7505.YahooMailNeo at web114712.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4F8E29FE.7070204 at clueland.com> <4F8EACB0.90404 at verizon.net>
	<4F8EAF80.1090208 at clueland.com>
Message-ID: <1334761492.7274.YahooMailNeo at web84506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

It's often strange to see a favorite book through another reader's eyes. I find fantasy in every word and sentence of the book and can't imagine seeing it otherwise. 


Perhaps this is because I approach Wolfe and fantasy from a third perspective in addition to those mentioned: (1) ideology (Catholicism) and (2) sensibility (pre-postmodernism, as someone put it). A fourth approach might be science. But I consider style over all else; to me, style defines SF.


What writers like Charles de Lint do is called "urban fantasy" by some. I find the "fantasy" in these stories to be highly separable from the "urban" part, which invariably holds no interest for me because its style is flat.

What Crowley does shows how de Lint falls flat.



________________________________
 From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at clueland.com>
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: (urth) If I already like ...
 
On 4/18/2012 6:59 AM, David Stockhoff wrote:
> On 4/17/2012 10:42 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
>> On 4/17/2012 2:08 PM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
>>> I strongly second the recommendation for Crowley, and I'd start with
>>> /Little, Big, /although he's never written anything bad since /Beasts/.
>>
>> _Little, Big_ was a disappointment for me. Part of the novel is urban,
>> but the specks of actual fantasy come before and after.
>>
>
> Do you mean classic Victorian-style fantasy vs urban fantasy?


I was ready for either, but outside of a talking fish and bird, I came 
up empty. It has to be the least fantastic fantasy I've ever encountered.

Other than that, it was okay.


-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at clueland.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120418/b8398a87/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net