Marcus Aurelius (re)visited

Lee Berman · 27 Apr 2012, 11:11 · from 2012-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:11:16 -0400
Subject: (urth) Marcus Aurelius (re)visited
Message-ID: <SNT123-W65A71617367F9DF1EF870DCF250 at phx.gbl>



>there are two ways the emperor could have influenced Wolfe's conception of  
>Severian: first, by offering an opposing example of an almost good and 
>thoughtful man, raised as such and groomed to be emperor; second, by 
>similarity, as a dutiful, if not entirely good, man in a bad world who 
>becomes emperor by "accident.".....I 
>do not see Severian as a recreation of Marcus, rather as the result of 
>an experiment in first-person narration inspired by the memoirs of the 
>Roman emperors in general and of Marcus in particular as a unique 
>combination of character, chance of birth, and philosophy.
 
Interesting comparisons and insights.
 
>The universe, then, is God, of whom the popular gods are manifestations; 
>while legends and myths are allegorical. The soul of man is thus an 
>emanation from the godhead, into whom it will eventually be re-absorbed.
 
This is as good a summation as any of the way I see Wolfe presenting Man, 
God and the Sun Series universe.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net