Chesterton'a "lunar virescence"

David Stockhoff · 01 Jun 2012, 19:50 · from 2012-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:50:24 -0400
Subject: (urth) Chesterton'a "lunar virescence"
In-Reply-To: <8885B2BE-8043-413C-A3C5-F7BD62827001 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W2133B6A6FAEF125D03402CCF050 at phx.gbl>
	<4FC8FDAC.4070606 at verizon.net>
	<8885B2BE-8043-413C-A3C5-F7BD62827001 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FC91D00.2070505 at verizon.net>

On 6/1/2012 3:48 PM, entonio at gmail.com wrote:
> I think you have to be a catholic or a 'paleoconservative' in order not to be offended by Chesterton, unless you are very well read (quality more than quantity), in which case you may choose to enjoy his genius past anything else.
>
> Maybe Wolfe can afford to be soft spoken because Chesterton took upon himself the dirty work that needed done. The man was a Maccabee.

Interesting. What should I be offended by? His politics, or his 
religion? I especially appreciate his disdain for imperialism and its 
expression in the press.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net