Urth Net

← back to the conversation

No lie?

Tony Ellis · 15 Nov 1999, 17:58 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Tony Ellis" <tony.ellis at futurenet.co.uk>
Subject: (urth) re: No lie?
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 17:58:11 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0461 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0461.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roy C. Lackey wrote:

> Of the instances that I cited, more than one of them are cases where the
> statements which are elsewhere contradicted are--literally--parenthetical
> comments, which need not have been made at all. The fact that they occur =
at
> all, as well as the way in which they are made, lead me to believe that
> Wolfe went out of his way to make them, that they are not mistakes on his
> part.
>
Well, that can be argued either way. You can just as easily
say (and I do) that the parenthetical nature of the
contradictions shows that GW wasn't thinking too hard when
he wrote them. He's on the umpteenth rewrite, he adds a few
little insights, rewords a couple of weak-looking
paragraphs, and because he's Severian's creator, not
Severian, he makes a few mistakes. It's all too easy, as
anyone will know who's ever had cause to regret inserting
what seemed at the time a brilliant last-minute argument
into an essay five minutes before deadline.

Nobody, not even GW, is perfect. Once you start milling down
any work of literature as finely as we do, you're going to
find ugly, illusion-shattering errors. Lady Macbeth: did she
have children or didn't she? Robinson Crusoe: swims naked to
the wreck, fills his pockets with useful stuff. Dr John
Watson or Dr James Watson?

I would be more convinced by the Severian forgets\lies to us
theory if the contradictions were -less- parenthetical.


*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net