Chesterton'a "lunar virescence"

entonio at gmail.com · 04 Jun 2012, 23:49 · from 2012-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (entonio at gmail.com)
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:49:19 +0100
Subject: (urth) Chesterton'a "lunar virescence"
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rthcoO-+4HyvvdCUjMPy8MvYVMM3CuBf0wQapkK+OQyZMA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W2133B6A6FAEF125D03402CCF050 at phx.gbl>
	<4FC8FDAC.4070606 at verizon.net>
	<8885B2BE-8043-413C-A3C5-F7BD62827001 at gmail.com>
	<4FC91D00.2070505 at verizon.net>
	<CAJ8=rthcoO-+4HyvvdCUjMPy8MvYVMM3CuBf0wQapkK+OQyZMA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71538944-33C9-4C0E-A650-D47DEB4F3725 at gmail.com>

No dia 01/06/2012, ?s 21:05, "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Well, one has to allow for his ideas about things like women's suffrage...

I happen to think women's (or men's, if it were the case) suffrage isn't a huge question in practical terms, for the simple reason that women do not constitute a social stratum. NB I say practical terms but I mean policy determination rather than election results.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net