Predictions Re: The Politics Of Gene Wolfe

António Pedro Marques · 29 Jul 2012, 00:55 · from 2012-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:55:18 +0100
Subject: (urth) Predictions Re: The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <1343514701.10536.YahooMailClassic at web160704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1343514701.10536.YahooMailClassic at web160704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <BABD4ADC-8838-4DCA-8304-08679140AB49 at gmail.com>

I don't find 'socialism has taken over the free world' in those predictions. 

No dia 28/07/2012, ?s 23:31, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> escreveu:

> He was far far more overtly political in his short stories of the early 70s and in Operation Ares, and most of that stuff was not reprinted.  If anything as we get farther away from the bogeyman of socialism actually being the dominant zeitgeist of our time his fiction leaves political obsessions behind for narrative and spiritual preoccupations.  Just my two cents.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Sat, 7/28/12, Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Predictions Re: The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Saturday, July 28, 2012, 7:18 AM
> 
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Fernando Gouvea <fqgouvea at colby.edu> wrote:
> > I'm wondering why you care so much.
> 
> I have a long-standing interest in predictions and what they reveal,
> which would alone would justify my interest, but besides that...
> 
> I care because I wish one of my favorite authors to be an
> intellectually respectable author, perhaps along the lines of
> Chesterton or Buckley or Charles Murray who I also enjoy reading, and
> it's disappointing to me to see that it's not a few allusions or plot
> twists that I perhaps was simply misinterpreting or being overly
> sensitive to.
> 
> And also because people here seem to have a hard time accepting it, so
> additional data is welcome; witness the previous attempts to explain
> it all away, or in this thread the suggestion that maybe he was joking
> or trolling!
> 
> -- 
> gwern
> http://www.gwern.net
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20120729/b67c513f/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net