Predictions Re: The Politics Of Gene Wolfe

Gwern Branwen · 01 Aug 2012, 20:52 · from 2012-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gwern0 at gmail.com (Gwern Branwen)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:52:06 -0400
Subject: (urth) Predictions Re: The Politics Of Gene Wolfe
In-Reply-To: <20120801203819.QUJX8874.eastrmfepo103.cox.net at eastrmimpo209.cox.net>
References: <CAMwO0gxbghmGqZNc7cWrV5uZFeqAjWBGRJ0GPe4sumkjWpqqgA at mail.gmail.com>
	<5013ED08.8020106 at colby.edu>
	<CAMwO0gw+gdkUEJz8YGhJ=TAE3e3yYcUBLHfd+hHujrDD3sNxiA at mail.gmail.com>
	<8C97F2C6-F73F-48E9-BE33-6D2603638AE0 at gmail.com>
	<50189629.2010800 at verizon.net>
	<2D12BD77-1325-4D55-A17B-0BA5DB947308 at liftingfaces.com>
	<50191BEE.6060402 at verizon.net>
	<8B488A81-86B0-42BB-B96B-80C5F251A42B at liftingfaces.com>
	<50192750.5060509 at verizon.net>
	<69B44E71-236D-4C6A-AB1D-C159CA25B380 at liftingfaces.com>
	<1343844296.27434.YahooMailNeo at web84508.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<362C6AC4-FD7D-43C1-9DAC-983471EB3743 at liftingfaces.com>
	<20120801203819.QUJX8874.eastrmfepo103.cox.net at eastrmimpo209.cox.net>
Message-ID: <CAMwO0gxi6m+bX1=wVQ2B7C6GkhvsR7bd8NCxzHNy1+EyAgnnmQ at mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:38 PM, James B. Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net> wrote:
> It's odd that a man who has written from a Christian, in his case Roman
> Catholic, strongly libertarian, anti-welfare state, and traditional
> conservative semi-isolationist perspective -- which after all is and has
> been advocated by people with IQs well over 150 for centuries and was the
> position of the founders of the United States -- is considered loony for
> doing so.

I sincerely hope the Founding Fathers would not have endorsed those
predictions when they were made; I had more respect for them. (On the
other hand, the colonists *were* conspiracy theorists who thought that
England was systematically undermining their liberties in order to
convert the colonies into fiefs which the Church of England and
monarchy could drain the blood out of for their private profit and
interpreted every move as a step in this cunningly laid plan by the
King's councilors and allies, so perhaps we shouldn't be overly
concerned with what they might have thought. No one's perfect.)

I don't consider him 'loony' for writing from that perspective. I even
cited 3 of my favorite authors who all fit that description (well,
except for the Roman Catholicism part - I believe Murray is not
Catholic).

I consider him 'loony' for making predictions that were obviously
going to be wrong at the time, and are even more obviously wrong now,
in the same way I consider contemporary Communists to be loony.

-- 
gwern
http://www.gwern.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net