The Book of the New Sun vs. A Song of Ice and Fire
Jerry Friedman · 02 Aug 2012, 01:48
· from 2012-August.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jerry_friedman at yahoo.com (Jerry Friedman) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (urth) The Book of the New Sun vs. A Song of Ice and Fire In-Reply-To: <1343871827.5748.YahooMailNeo at web114707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <50192826.7020800 at verizon.net> <1343831425.70197.YahooMailClassic at web160701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <CAOVrOBcJEkBv9viamwnJah_K5NDB5gT-0mpyzt-e_bRoUM0G6Q at mail.gmail.com> <CAJ8=rtg_ejXjRkp17HK3eTgPjZQs4G1G_TikTiTKqifZuoo6Ew at mail.gmail.com> <5019BD57.8000507 at clueland.com> <1343871827.5748.YahooMailNeo at web114707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1343872135.32562.YahooMailNeo at web114713.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> > From: Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com> >> From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at clueland.com> >> On 8/1/2012 1:19 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: > ... > >>> ? The Society for Creative Anachronism likes to say that it recreates >>> ? "the middle ages as they should have been." Martin describes > a >>> ? medieval fantasy world as it really would have been. >> >> Sort of: >> > http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/07/08/game-of-thrones-author-george-r-r-martin-spills-the-secrets-of-a-dance-with-dragons/ >> >> >> "You once said that fantasy needs to reflect reality. Can you explain > what >> you meant by that? >> >> Well, I think all fiction needs to reflect reality. Fiction is lies, we?re >> writing about people who never existed and events that never happened when > we >> write fiction, whether its science fiction or fantasy or western mystery > stories >> or so-called literary stories. All those things are essentially untrue. But > it >> has to have a truth at the core of it. You?re still writing about people, > you?re >> writing about the human condition. I often quote Faulkner, who said in his >> speech after winning the Nobel Prize that 'the human heart in conflict > with >> itself' is the only thing worth writing about. And I?ve always agreed > with >> that. It?s true no matter what genre you?re writing in, even if there are >> dragons in it or it?s about a private detective or a western gunslinger, > it?s >> still ultimately about the human heart in conflict with itself or it?s not >> worth?reading." >> >> Apparently, the history and other fantastic parts are implausibly > grandeurous >> intentionally because they exist only to serve the realistic characters and >> plot. > > > I don't see in that quotation that he says why the series has fantastic > parts, much less what their "only" purpose is. ?I also don't think > "a truth at the core of it" is necessarily the same as "realistic > characters?and?plot." Even "reflect reality" isn't necessarily the same as "realistic characters and plot", I'd say, especially not the "plot" part, though it's closer than the phrase I mentioned above. ?Sorry I didn't notice that before. Jerry Friedman
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net