Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Seawrack and the Mother

António Pedro Marques · 18 Sep 2012, 18:10 · from 2012-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:10:01 +0100
Subject: (urth) Seawrack and the Mother
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rthNtS__B0YokX__NUUxuka25jacyaWrtaKhnfda+8F5Ow at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W47ADE4CCB1EDA6F237B90BCF940 at phx.gbl>
	<50586898.7030907 at verizon.net> <5058744C.9050005 at gmail.com>
	<CAJ8=rthNtS__B0YokX__NUUxuka25jacyaWrtaKhnfda+8F5Ow at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5058B8F9.7030905 at gmail.com>

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (18-09-2012 16:55):
> Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>> ? Wasn't Seawrack's arm bitten off by Babbie? It was missing, not shot.
>
> Well, that's what the Narrator believes. That doesn't make it true.

? If her arm has been torn off, it has been torn off. Torn off. Not shot. 
Torn off. You might as well posit that she didn't lose her arm at all and 
it's all in the narrator's head.
That's of course not entering all the other bits (what would an aquatic 
creature like Seawrack doing in a boat, etc).


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net