Seawrack and the Mother

David Stockhoff · 30 Sep 2012, 17:12 · from 2012-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:12:19 -0400
Subject: (urth) Seawrack and the Mother
In-Reply-To: <50680264.3080303 at clueland.com>
References: <SNT123-W63AD7A71AA72E63BFCD663CF9F0 at phx.gbl>
	<505F12D9.7030307 at verizon.net>
	<8F94BDDA-74B5-45CB-8D47-1217A66B5F09 at gmail.com>	<505F8CDA.5000105 at verizon.net>
	<50680264.3080303 at clueland.com>
Message-ID: <50687D73.90009 at verizon.net>


On 9/30/2012 4:27 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> On 9/23/2012 5:27 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>
>> It doesn't quite fit. I meant (1) two sexes (a) separate or (b)
>> combined, or (2) no sexes, but also pointing out that a single male or
>> female seeder/birther/creator isn't really any of those. That is, you
>> can't have only one sex. Incest is a bit like two-housed
>> hermaphroditism, from this perspective.
>
>
> I think you can have a single sexed creator if the created is the 
> other sex.
>
How would that work, exactly?

---If a female creator spawned (through parthenogenesis?) a male creation?

---Or if a female creation developed from a sperm cell?

Parent-offspring incest would then follow. It's conceivable, but sounds 
deliberately perverse, like something Lovecraftian or Milton's Satan.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net