Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Claw = Fang?

David Stockhoff · 22 Nov 2012, 21:54 · from 2012-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:54:14 -0500
Subject: (urth) Claw = Fang?
In-Reply-To: <1353617353.99081.YahooMailNeo at web124505.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <CAPdJJvTmcd24XS1kheuUAFU9vV_NOUM4rQLxZB6f4EOZVzwOSA at mail.gmail.com>
	<50AE27D5.8090105 at verizon.net>
	<1353617353.99081.YahooMailNeo at web124505.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <50AE9F06.4040008 at verizon.net>


On 11/22/2012 3:49 PM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
> From: David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>
> Very well thought out! If the thorn is the key to the meaning of the Claw, and fangs do seem to occupy a space adjacent to thorns, they are therefore a link to the Claw.
>> It occurs to me that the Claw is not associated with any animal, even by speculation. One thinks of a bird, especially a bird of prey, but this is not supported at all.
> ...
>
> In fact it's rejected.
>
> "(Because the Conciliator is given a Claw, one is tempted to make the easy association of the eagle of Jove with the sun; it is perhaps too pat.)"
>
> CotC, Appendix
>
> Jerry Friedman

Yes, of course. "Perhaps too pat" indeed. It all but instructs us to 
look elsewhere, doesn't it? Away from the pagan and toward Genesis, maybe.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net