Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Hard SF

David Duffy · 29 Nov 2012, 21:36 · from 2012-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au (David Duffy)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:36:41 +1000
Subject: (urth) Hard SF
In-Reply-To: <3F06D85E0A9149E89A4A8864DF5CD523@Rover>
References: <SNT123-W51C23DE417511A76E93303CF5D0 at phx.gbl><CAGB0RZ6-Zg0AMVwFt=KEA-H38Xg5aUQJadq32C9oNC3qxDC-Bw at mail.gmail.com><1354122262.68401.YahooMailNeo at web84513.mail.ne1.yahoo.com><50B69648.5090405 at verizon.net><41B2AA23-B918-4FBE-830C-52F357BB7409 at gmail.com><50B6D48B.1050800 at verizon.net>
	<3F06D85E0A9149E89A4A8864DF5CD523@Rover>
Message-ID: <alpine.LMD.2.00.1211300719210.23968 at orpheus.qimr.edu.au>

On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Gerry Quinn wrote:

> And there?s the kind where the writer takes some dubious physics theory 
> and extrapolates wildly based on that (e.g. Schild?s Ladder by Greg 
> Egan).

I don't know what's going on with you people.  First someone calls Kim 
Stanley Robinson boring, and now Gerry's making out quantum loop gravity 
is dubious.  Didn't you read Egan's paper?

http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0208010.pdf

And no, it's not in the section next to

http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8144

Cheers, David Duffy.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net