mankind

Alex David Groce · 25 Nov 1999, 11:47 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alex David Groce" <adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) mankind
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 11:47:49
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0538 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0538.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> In other words, you have no proof.
>=20
> I am genuinely disappointed, Alex,  as I was hoping you'd come up with
> something imaginative or at the very least interesting to buttress your
> point of view.  If you are unwilling or unable to suport your opion with =
any
> actual evidence from the book then all you are doing is making bald
> assertions of fact where the facts are absent.  It's a great thing to have
> certain beliefs about TBOTNS, but if you cannot back up these beliefs then
> these discussions quickly start generating more heat than light.
>=20
> Ori

OK.  I will agree that this thread has degenerated to that point (as it did
last time), but I've got to elaborate on what I said above.  First of all, =
my
evidence would consist of just about every passage where Severian starts
talking about the Increate--are these simply window-dressing?  But in gener=
al,
these don't PROVE anything, any more than your Chapter 34 proves anything. =
 I
could raise points like "Why refer so explicitly to 'Eschatology and Genesi=
s'
in the text unless we're to connect these events to non-secular eschatology=
 and
genesis?"  But this also fails as a proof, and even fails to capture what I
think Wolfe is getting at.  I'm serious when I say you have to read the who=
le
thing--trying to explain how a car works by showing someone just the wheel =
or
the cigarette lighter or the fan belt is unwise--and novels are generally m=
ore
complex than cars, if they're well done.  I doubt that by selective quoting=
 I
can prove what I'm saying to you any more than you've proven what you're sa=
ying
to me--I DO grant that your interpretation can be reached, if you bring cer=
tain
assumptions to BOTNS, but you seem to still refuse to grant that I can hold=
 my
point of view in good faith, which, considering it's THE AUTHOR'S POINT OF
VIEW, makes no sense to me.

Much more interesting is the talk going on about whether the person in the
street would have been happy about the New Sun if they'd understood it.  My
guess is a few would have been, most would not.  This ties in with the orig=
inal
Messiah's arrival quite nicely--everyone was expecting a secular Messiah wh=
o,
though annointed by God, would establish a Jewish Kingdom and throw out the
Roman bums.  Severian, of course, IS a secular Messiah--what he's doing may=
 be
instrumental in saving men's souls (and Jesus, who had other things to do,
seems to have been being both literal and figurative when he said "Feed my
sheep"--God isn't completely unaware that people need food and shelter and a
sun that works) but it's primarily material.  Unfortunately for those who h=
ave
been waiting for the New Sun, its benefit will not come to all of them (tho=
ugh
I'm unconvinced the death is as widespread as some seem to think--Severian
hasn't found the only island of humans).  I really think some people would =
be
willing to die to bring better days, but most would not.  It is a genuinely
awful choice, but Ragnarok really is worse than the floods.  That Erebus and
Abaia oppose the New Sun seems the ultimate proof of its desirability--I mi=
ght
believe the Yesod crowd is lying, but I have trouble believing Erebus and A=
baia
have anything but ill will at heart--if Abaia made the Ascians what they ar=
e,
then if Abaia's against it there must be something to be said for it.

Hmm...  This also makes Dr. Talos perhaps the weirdest semi-John the Baptist
figure in literature.

--=20
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu)
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~adgroce

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net