Agilus and Agia

Sergei SOLOVIEV · 06 May 2013, 16:08 · from 2013-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: soloviev at irit.fr (Sergei SOLOVIEV)
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 18:08:15 +0200
Subject: (urth) Agilus and Agia
In-Reply-To: <D7FE7D6BB15845D99D4050FD4DD7DA03@Rover>
References: <BLU175-W38CD1646568FF4BB3EDE66CFB90 at phx.gbl><61ED0AB5-0512-44CA-86CE-3A47F063FFA1 at yahoo.com>	<5187B3D0.7090804 at irit.fr>
	<D7FE7D6BB15845D99D4050FD4DD7DA03@Rover>
Message-ID: <5187D56F.6010809 at irit.fr>

I meant that GW could not know some technical details and difficulties 
of cloning that we know now. These details
were discussed in some posts. Of course he could assume that cloning 
will be easy and advanced,
but I don't think he would have in mind such details.

Sergei Soloviev

Gerry Quinn wrote:
>
>
> From: Sergei SOLOVIEV
>
>> And don't forget that cloning is progressing very quickly. What was 
>> known when the books we discuss were written?
>
> That it would most likely progress quickly?
>
> What I mean is that a SF author in the '80s could safely postulate 
> easy and advanced cloning, since there are no obvious impassable 
> physical or biological barriers to it.
>
> - Gerry Quinn
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net