TBOTNS FAQ

Christy · 12 Dec 1999, 14:05 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Christy <cglst7+ at pitt.edu>
Subject: (urth) TBOTNS FAQ
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:05:49
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0609 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0609.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've been eavesdropping on this FAQ conversation (though I fear it's
dying down) and I can't help but feel that there is a skewed approach
being taken to the project.

Is it the duty of the FAQ to initiate one into the "mysteries" of TBOTNS?
Or to initiate one into the method of reading Gene Wolfe? The curious
system of Wolfe infers a lot of assumed knowledge that, time and time
again, we have proved that we don't have. So the chance of a neophyte
having it is even slighter.

So: shan't we we give readers a better sense of Wolfe's background, so we
know the mind we are up against when we interpret? Shan't we quote
interviews and essays when coming up against the rough stuff? Shan't we
familiarize FAQ users with the Gene Wolfe leitmotifs/literary topoi:
ancient Greeks, British Isles mythology, old school SF, Borges and Poe,
etc? Shan't we stick to solid ground rather than the drag-out debates, for
example the continent one?

I would help with the FAQ where needed, and I feel that a lot of us are=20
saying the same. I volunteer =3Dmantis=3D for the chair. If we were in a big
Congress and I were sitting next to him, I would raise his hand forcibly
when the issue was raised. After all, he's the only one here who has got a
book under his belt, vanity press or otherwise.

In any case, I feel like the FAQ should tell us something more of Gene
Wolfe, what he has written, what philosophies he has expressed, who he IS=20
and how much of himself he has thrown into his work, before any
speculation is made to who Severian's parents are and what Wolfe's
pantheons consist of.

				-C-

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net