Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Fuligin?

Gerry Quinn · 16 Jul 2014, 17:36 · from 2014-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:36:34 +0100
Subject: (urth) Fuligin?
In-Reply-To: <53C6A792.2020707 at clueland.com>
References: <CAN-9QX4gvkpvweYgPHcEk_B9nkuXmEsx40LiLo80Aws9GncYeg at mail.gmail.com>	<CAM0v-i4=0pckCCv6WrhMzttXMH8CyaPRG87fNOHS3TWXgjjrpg at mail.gmail.com>	<53B86139004A0FE9 at smtpout10.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk>	<53C54DC5.1040400 at clueland.com>	<53C6800F.8050205 at verizon.net>	<53B866BA00C3D4E1 at rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk>	(added	by	postmaster at btinternet.com)	<53C69E85.5030703 at clueland.com>	<1405526209.20684.YahooMailNeo at web120303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<53C6A792.2020707 at clueland.com>
Message-ID: <53C6B822.4010706 at bindweed.com>


On 16/07/2014 17:25, Jeffery Wilson clueland.com wrote:
> On 7/16/2014 10:56 AM, DAVID STOCKHOFF wrote:
>
> > And I doubt there would be a
>> common term for it anyway---who would have it sitting around the house?
>
> People whose homes contain Emerald Tablets and homunculi, and other 
> 20th century electrical conveniences like electric eyes and metal 
> detectors, or whose homes are rocketships crammed full of eternally 
> repaired ancient gear that might include mercury switches, mercury 
> balances, mercury bearings, et cetera.  Autarch Severian is both, and 
> then some.

For the educated classes in the Commonwealth, the substance would be 
reasonably familiar,  Probably not so much for the common people, But I 
don't see any issue with the use of a new technical name for it.  Mars 
and Venus have new names, why not mercury?

Also, if Severian is familiar with mercury, shouldn't he explain to us 
why hydrargyrum is superior for weighting swords?

If it's not different, what does it matter if it is something else? 
Sure, some future EPA may have banned the use of mercury, but if so it's 
been replaced by a new material that to all intents and purposes is 
exactly the same!

- Gerry Quinn


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net