Urth Net

← back to the conversation

May 2014 Wolfe interview in _Technology Review_

Gerry Quinn · 06 Aug 2014, 12:00 · from 2014-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:00:44 +0100
Subject: (urth) FW: May 2014 Wolfe interview in _Technology Review_
In-Reply-To: <CAF1072yy39muUiug5Bui-2V5pSb_=1GaruX1NvB_WUVCsgJSqA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU175-W42BD535A84E517514F50BFCFE20 at phx.gbl>	<BLU175-W520C61EA0D3C57B6889B2DCFE20 at phx.gbl>	<53E0B007.5070908 at bindweed.com>	<CAF1072w0FqjGtdxJ3vJqV7XZr02JC4z-r-fYNg9tu4CRdwkLUA at mail.gmail.com>	<53E104DE.2040107 at bindweed.com>	<CAF1072w_0qtuKD5sgsz93XOB1wEOsj_BJH-zkv6YEHC5CytKTg at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF1072yy39muUiug5Bui-2V5pSb_=1GaruX1NvB_WUVCsgJSqA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53E218EC.3000309 at bindweed.com>


On 05/08/2014 18:12, Marc Aramini wrote:
> It also seems to me that brides involve a method of propagation and 
> reproduction, you know?  like the life cycle involves them somehow.  
> But like I said, I really don't want to argue too much about this 
> because our views on parallel symbolic associations in Fifth Head of 
> Cerberus are diametrically opposed.

Marc, all I can say is: re-read the full page or two before the 'brides' 
(actually 'wives') line.  It's ALL a detailed description of the 
drug-bearing plant and what it does for them and how they use it. The 
'wives' are introduced as an analogy for how it makes them feel.  You 
are blowing off two pages of detailed exegesis on the basis of a word or 
two, words which have natural interpretations in the drug scenario as 
explained.  And not just here.

Why does Wolfe - or, if you prefer, Victor - go on for pages about this 
plant if it doesn't exist?  It's not symbolic association, it's flat out 
SF info-dump!

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net