5HC
Lee · 25 Aug 2014, 03:13
· from 2014-August.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:13:12 -0400 Subject: (urth) 5HC Message-ID: <BLU175-W92D4EB04A302AD3FBDCA9CFDF0 at phx.gbl> >Gerry Quinn: If you are thinking of Marsch's first visit to Saltimbanque Street, >that was Victor. The original Marsch never visited Sainte Croix. I can see that interpretation coming from Number Five's observation that a ship from Ste. Anne had landed on St. Croix the day before Marsch's first visit to 666 Satimbanque St. However, I notice that months pass between Marsch's first and second visit. Also, I think in his first visit Marsch is too familiar with cloning and the scanning process which created Mr. Million. Information from Earth Victor would likely not be privy to. Moreover, I don't think there would be travel from a major travel hub like Earth directly to a backwater like Ste. Anne. More likely, the direct travel is from Earth to the urbanized and civilized St. Croix. Thus I continue to interpret that the first visit of Dr. Marsch was the real guy newly landed from Earth. After first meeting Dr. Veil, he then found passage to Ste. Anne for his anthropological studies for a few months, was replaced and then returned to St. Croix and 666 Saltimbanque St. later. Marsch's first visit was to meet Dr. Veil. I don't see why Victor would want to do that. I would expect him to put as much distance between himself and Veil's Hypothesis as possible. Marsch's second visit was for the purpose of whoring which I think Victor is likely more interested in. >all we know is that Marsch died and Victor took his place. Again, we do not "know" this (unless you count Wolfe's interview as evidence). Within the text, we are told the story that the boy died. Apparently, you do not believe this story? By the same principles of deduction, others have recognized that other stories within this story, including the Shadow Children story, are also false. >Perhaps indicating that devotion and scepticism can be carried to excess Indeed.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net