Ziggurat spoilers, or "The good company you keep"

Alex David Groce · 21 Jan 2000, 17:07 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce at gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: (urth) Ziggurat spoilers, or "The good company you keep"
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:07:04
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0712 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0712.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hmmm...  Yeah, I caught the Tamar reference--I hadn't thought of the
daughter-of-the-future possibility--but this is a clone of a step-daughter =
if
so, which IMO makes Emory considerably less responsible for incest than, sa=
y,
Severian.  I simply don't think the story presents things so as to suggest
that the incest (with the daughters) is real.

Yes, Emory kills the coyote--but acknowledges his own guilt, if you look
closely.  Certainly he's a <vastly> more ambiguously bad figure than
Baldanders (not that Wolfe doesn't give even Baldanders his devil's due).

It seems to me that Emory IS quite Weer-ish:  they share a kind of curiosity
that can lead them into error/disaster, yet also seems to serve as a redeem=
ing
element (consider a Weer who DIDN'T hunt for the treasure with Lois, or an
Emory who said "hell, I'm not going back to my cabin with those crazies, le=
t's
find a motel, son").  Both have a kind of wisdom that they often seem unable
to apply to themselves (note Weer's comment re: testifying about the abuse
to the "good twin"--his reference here to God makes me have trouble seeing
Emory as a cut-off-from-creation figure like Baldanders).  Emory's certainly
flawed, and his curiosity gets his son murdered, but he also seems to me to
have a considerable amount of author sympathy (in this sense I disagree with
Gardner Dozois' comments in the intro to whichever Year's Best SF he didn't
print "The Ziggurat" in as well as with Swanwick--Wolfe hardly ever portrays
a protagonist without massive, potentially deadly, flaws--but Emory has as
much underlying author sympathy with him as, say, Number 5 or Weer, I think=
).
In fact, I think one thing this story does is set up a situation where it
seems to be a possibility of a "lone man defending his cabin against invade=
rs"
and then turns it inside-out--neither the man nor the invaders are purely
evil or wrong--both are trapped by misunderstanding and human nature--but t=
he
end indicates that even in these cirumstances, after blood and pain, there =
may
be a possibility for something else, even if that's ambiguous, too.

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu)
Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department
8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net