You have the wrong creation you ninny - eschatology and genesis
Lee · 08 Sep 2014, 12:22
· from 2014-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:22:48 -0400 Subject: (urth) You have the wrong creation you ninny - eschatology and genesis Message-ID: <BLU175-W36155AECB96963941F9E6CFC10 at phx.gbl> >Jeff Wilson: If he's in the correct cycle but in a much latter era, >then the son of Meschia not being born yet seems like a contradiction. >Cain needs to be born before the autarch, doesn't he, esp if he's the >firstborn of humanity? I agree. I find much in the text of BotNS to support the idea that Urth/ Briah was originally intended as a previous iteration of our Earth. The very name "Urth" implies the past. If Severian's world were a future version of Earth, wouldn't Wolfe have chosen to name it "Skuld", for the Norn of the future. I am loathe to think Wolfe chose the name "Urth" soley for the funky spelling, ignoring the meaning. Moreover, everything about Urth says to me "pre-Christian" society. The giant pagan "gods" running about, the barbarism, the witchcraft, the absence of a salvation route, etc. There is a Jesus-like figure mentioned in Short Sun but why is he associated with a Dionysian God rather than a Jehovian God? Then there is Severian. Wolfe has said he is a "Christ-like" figure. Is he the Second Coming? The Third or Fourth? That just doesn't seem right to me. Severian seems more like an imperfect proto-Christ than a later version of him . Plus, like the pre-Christian gods, Severian ends up in a mini-pantheon of other (false?) gods like Odilo and Thais. To me, Urth is a socially, historically and technologically advanced version of Earth. But it is a spiritually stunted version which has only advanced to Earth's Noah level at the time of Severian. It makes more sense to me that Urth is a previous iteration of Earth than Urth having spiritually degenerated and all the progress which Jesus brought having been lost. >Marc Aramini: I think the insistence Urth is a previous iteration is a retcon >of the Jordan interview to avoid Prostestant wrath - he isn't going to meet >Cain in the next iteration. We must agree to disagree, Marc. In the same interview, Wolfe flatly states his belief that the pagan gods were real and the ancients were in fact building temples and worshipping beings that did truly exist. If Wolfe is going to commit such blasphemy in one part of the interview, why would he tiptoe around fundamentalist Protestantism to the point of retconning his own work in another part of the interview. Surely the reality of pagan gods is more heretical and offensive than the fictional depiction of God breaking his Covenant. (also, I don't think the concept of time, in years, has any meaning in regard to universal iterations. I think the idea is that time, as we know it, is reset to zero at the creation of a new universe.)
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net