Wolfe's Theology

Jim Jordan · 28 Jan 2000, 10:05 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jim Jordan <jbjordan at gnt.net>
Subject: (urth) Wolfe's Theology
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:05:17
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0741 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0741.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 06:39 PM 1/24/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>BLUE seems to deal with this in a central way, as well.  I think I've said
>before that Wolfe seems to have a strong similarity with Dante's explorati=
on
>in The Divine Comedy (adopted from St. Thomas, of course)--that only where=20
>there is love can there be real moral pain or evil--at the root of the wor=
st
>things lies a perversion or erroneous hierarchy of loves--for Dante, and, I
>suspect Wolfe, a hierarchy that mistakes some lesser object for God and
inverts
>the ladder of love into a parodic downward spiral.  Thus the insistence th=
at
>although Abaia/Erebus etc. can thwart the Increate to the extent that they
>violate, presumably, the inherent good of their own natures, they cannot f=
ail
>to serve also as unwilling and angry agents of Providence--another theme
in the
>philosophies I'm guessing Wolfe is most comfortable with (anyway, the ones
>Chesterton's POV is based upon*).

	There's no need to guess about this. It is very clear in "The Detective of
Dreams" that the Dreammaster has "other servants" who don't like Him but
who do His bidding by being allowed to do what they want to do. But none of
this thwarts the Increate; Emery's statement to his stepdaughter about why
it is important not to lie gives Wolfe's opinion (which of course is just
plain old orthodox, non-manichaean Christianity): Lies can't hurt God; they
can only hurt us, which is why God does not want us to do it. Abaia et al.
ultimately only "thwart" themselves when they "kick against the pricks"
(which is how Jesus explained Saul-Paul's attacks against Him).
>
>
>* for a (very Christian-biased, of course) treatment of the parts of Aquin=
as/
>Augustine/Anselm/Aristotle and other "A"-list philosophers who seem to
have an
>influence on Wolfe, I suggest Etienne Gilson's _The Spirit of Medieval=20
>Philosophy_, especially as Wolfe doesn't claim to have read them all in the
>original Latin/Greek or anything.

	Wolfe told me that when he married and took classes to become a Roman
Catholic, he read Aquinas. Given how he does not seem to forget anything, I
think it is a safe bet that his religious thinking is largely shaped by
Thomas, who of course mediates Augustine and Anselm. Then there's
Chesterton, of course. But for straight theology, looking at Aquinas is a
safe bet as regards Wolfe.

Nutria




*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net