Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Short Story 93: Procreation

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 07 Oct 2014, 21:06 · from 2014-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:06:56 -0700
Subject: (urth) Short Story 93: Procreation
In-Reply-To: <CAF1072wH+C1d-yWeUzXS3xb0XLe+wiOaK5u-gsMGYv+uQAoT-A at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BAY172-W301812964AC73A34E8D400DFA20 at phx.gbl>
	<CAF1072wH+C1d-yWeUzXS3xb0XLe+wiOaK5u-gsMGYv+uQAoT-A at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtjjj6HAEN81C3arQ82zn4gnG91quHFv126RTUtcs1ZXVg at mail.gmail.com>

Wherever the interview is, Wolfe is quite correct; in quantum mechanics a
particle travelling in one direction in time is the same thing as its
antiparticle travelling in the other direction in time. In the QM universe,
time's arrow seems not to apply...any given event can happen in either
direction. But decoherence gives us a meaningful entropy and so a
unidirectional time...

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wolfe makes the same statement in Seven American Nights about the
> forward/backward temporal nature of protons and electrons but I think the
> interview is cited at the bottom of that write up... Will check.
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, Robert Pirkola <rpirkola at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Marc Aramini wrote: "Gott?s science would be particularly interesting to
>> Wolfe, because he explores the possibility of time travel, and even states
>> in an interview: 'Certainly in the subatomic world, particles called
>> positrons look like they might actually be electrons traveling backward in
>> time.'"
>>
>> What interview are you quoting from?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141007/dee4dadc/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net