Short Story 8: Volksweapon
Norwood, Frederick Hudson · 08 Oct 2014, 14:57
· from 2014-October.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu (Norwood, Frederick Hudson) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:57:47 +0000 Subject: (urth) Short Story 8: Volksweapon In-Reply-To: <BAY172-W362D1E8167D35FBF8CAAE2DFA30 at phx.gbl> References: <BAY172-W362D1E8167D35FBF8CAAE2DFA30 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D011F79 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu> I'm so glad to see this discussion returning to the works of Gene Wolfe. Rick Norwood From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Robert Pirkola Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:28 AM To: urth at urth.net Subject: (urth) Short Story 8: Volksweapon Marc Aramini wrote on October 7, 2014: "Off topic, your input on volksweapon from a few months ago .. It is very suspicious that the hero wants to leave the dead girl alone, and the alleged killer wants to stay with her body or bring it. I feel that as a nonrealistic meta mystery your solution would work ... But with any degree of realism, the proper authorities would have the "hero" if he were at all related to the dead girl or her husband. He wouldn't get away with it as his motive would be obvious to authorities. "Oh wait... You are her husband?" However, the image of blinding the deer with a flashlight also seems as if it could describe the murder of the girl if the person who presents our solution is not trustworthy. I don't know. Maybe it should be revisited." Yeah, I am pretty sure you are right that Smythe can't have been the husband. It was an hypothesis too far, especially given that the third-person narrator specifically identifies him as, "game warden", which I think we have to trust. However, if you forget that ill-considered bit of speculation and make a different assumption (that does have plausible textual support) it remains narratively sound. Assume that Smythe was the person the moon-faced boy claims initially confronted he and Judy, and that his name is indeed an indication of his character. I generally associate smiting with Old Testament-style justice from on high and if Smythe knew that Judy was married and was committing adultery, he may have taken justice into his own hands and killed her for the transgression. Leviticus 20:10 "If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." This would also help explain why he disposes of the old hunter's derringer rather than allowing the judicial process to proceed. It is an example of justice like that exhibited by Solomon, though thankfully no babies were harmed in the making of that reference. This of course fails to explain two ambiguous statements from Smythe: The last line of the story, "I wish I could have given it to her" and "I suppose she and that fellow were driving out to one of the summer cottages on the lake - maybe not for the reasons you would think." Yeah, I want to believe the jacklighting bit is relevant beyond implicating the hunters, but I can't seem to make it fit the narrative. Smythe couldn't have used the technique to kill the girl as the MFB would have mentioned something about a bright light coming out of nowhere. The description of jacklighting given by Smythe on pg. 49: "The jacklighter shines a lamp or the headlights of a car into the woods and kind of hypnotizes the deer. Since the deer's eyes reflect the light, your poacher has a perfect target; the range is short and the deer's not moving. Usually your jacklighter uses a car and you can stop him on the road with the carcass in his trunk." Any ideas? For those interested, the discussion of this story started with Marc's post on March 29, 2012. http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2012-March/026740.html My follow-up was on July 2, 2014. http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2014-July/054877.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141008/d9412a7d/attachment-0001.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net