Urth Net

← back to the conversation

barrington interview

Marc Aramini · 08 Oct 2014, 15:20 · from 2014-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at gmail.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:20:23 -0700
Subject: (urth) barrington interview
In-Reply-To: <CAF1072xw1MdH5hQBaPVou6HTnOnaPQC6ccrK8s1bDPA0eXEGrw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU175-W425F4500EC369CCFBBD07ECFA30 at phx.gbl>
	<CAF1072xw1MdH5hQBaPVou6HTnOnaPQC6ccrK8s1bDPA0eXEGrw at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAF1072wv8X1ZPRQhJbMfX2_tqSmyhuqifCTYvMjJYzwsYaEfiQ at mail.gmail.com>

Thus the paradox of dualism, to which Wolfe definitely adheres.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:

> Gene was an engineer.  AN ENGINEER.  Engineering is not a soft science.
> Angles, physical properties, stress analyses, knowledge of quantifiable
> variables, structural integrity which might not be universals but are
> rigidly adhered to - just because Wolfe believes in God doesn't mean he
> thinks a modern playdough cross section will support a tile roof on our
> planet at room temperatures.
>
> As far as your last statement, I have a feeling it is more likely he feels
> God is outside the ability of man to circumscribe by any rational or
> irrational means and cannot be limited by language (the tale of the cock
> and the angel, for example.
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Lee <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Apologies. I didn't mean to imply any particular person in this
>> discussion is
>>
>> speaking entirely from emotional motivation..
>>
>> >On the universality of math:
>>
>> I disagree. I find ample evidence to the contrary in his literary work
>> and to some degree
>>
>> his interviews. But that's just my opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Still, perhaps we can agree that Gene Wolfe believes in God? If so and if
>> Gene Wolfe believes
>>
>> in the universality of math, wouldn't that mean the Gene Wolfe believes
>> God can be
>>
>> described by a mathematical equation?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141008/60e35402/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net