barrington interview

António Pedro Marques · 08 Oct 2014, 15:34 · from 2014-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:34:26 +0100
Subject: (urth) barrington interview
In-Reply-To: <0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D011F36 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>
References: <BLU175-W40E71F68BAD0DFC9702001CFA30 at phx.gbl>
	<0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D011F36 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>
Message-ID: <F7A14D7C-AD18-415B-86E5-2D78AF2985AC at gmail.com>

No dia 08/10/2014, ?s 15:46, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> escreveu:

> "I know my view pisses some people off" -- Lee
> 
> Like Ant?nio, you people's reactions as emotional.

Eh? I think you've got me and Lee mixed up. Your earlier reply in the same vein is to him as well, not me.

It may sound surprising, but I've had my number of violent clashes with Lee in the past. It was due to one of the things you complain about - he sometimes adopts a patronising tone that is neither warranted nor pullable - and to a tendency he had, but has lately avoided, of passing off his often borderline views as consensual.

But not every time people seem to be doing those two things are they really doing them. One must be careful and not lose sight of context.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net