Ziggurat as Delusion or SF
Alex David Groce · 06 Feb 2000, 11:03
· from urth-v0028.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce at gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: (urth) Ziggurat as Delusion or SF Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 11:03:27 Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0778 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0778.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dennis G. Berdanis asked some questions, I think I can answer a few: >1. What caused our future society to abandon men and only allow female >births? Would it be the traditional "Men destroyed the world and can't be >allowed to do it again. Women would never do that?" That would explain t= he >women's fear of men. I believe there was a new Outer Limits episode a few >years back that dealt with women experimenting with allowing men back into >society in the future and deciding against it. The handful of men corrupt= ed >the women, so no more were cloned. Hard to say what precisely caused it--however, the idea is not new to Wolfe= -- "In Looking Glass Castle" and "Many Mansions" both involve future female-on= ly societies. In general, I think Wolfe's take on such societies is that they are indicative of a terrible failure of humanity to deal with its nature. >2. Why would this future society of women be so prone to violence? I can >understand them robbing the cabin and vehicles to repair their ship. Why >would they be so determined to shoot anything they didn't understand? Why >would they force the twin to go to their ship and strip down then return >her? For her eggs as other's have speculated? I think part of this is Wolfe's sly way of pointing out that men and women all _that_ different: the "Brownies" aren't pacifistic or over-trusting, a= nd their behavior (intentionally I suspect) calls to mind the paranoid and pan= ic stricken behavior of a lot of crews of crashed spaceships in alien territory over the history of sf. Remember: presumably at some point, their society CHOSE to eliminate men, so Emory is an almost mythical monster from the past in their eyes. >1. Why did Emery keep saying the coyote was killed with a cyanide gun. >What is a cyanide gun exactly? How would he know it was killed with this >type of gun unless he did it?] I finally looked this up on the web. I'd heard the term before and knew it was some kind of animal trap, but couldn't remember the specifics: "Also introduced in the 1940s was a revolutionary, deadly new predator weap= on. The "coyote getter" is a pistol cartridge-powered cyanide gun that shoots a puff of deadly sodium cyanide dust into the mouth of any carnivore, omnivor= e, or carrion-eater that tugs on its scented wick. On contact with the moistur= e in the animal's mouth (or eyes, or wherever it hits) gas is released and the=20 animal is gassed to death (or blinded). A highly effective killer, the coyo= te=20 getter quickly gained widespread use. Eventually it was usurped by a newer=20 model, the spring loaded "M-44" coyote getter, which is still used today.=20 Over the years coyote getters have killed countless thousands of predators,=20 non-target animals, and even a few humans." (http://http://arrs.envirolink.org/ar-voices/eyeeye.html) Emory can tell because presumably the coyote is still beside the trap. THIS is, as far as I can tell, all that's involved in Emory's "killing" the coyo= te. He taught it not to fear human smell and so it took the bait. >3. What were Emery's plans for the coyote. I never understood, other than >Wolfe symbolism, what plans Emery could have for the frozen coyote body? He wanted to give it a proper burial, as with his son. He felt (rightly, b= ut in a limited sense) responsible for its death. It's (in part) Emory's empathy for the coyote and his feeling of responsibi= lity at its death that makes it hard for me to swallow the "Emory is damned" (see Nicholas Gevers' "Three readings") interpretations of this story. "Follow = the Wolfe" for me does not lead to Emory as delusional or evil. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32 -- Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu) Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department 8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net