Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Latro

David Stockhoff · 26 Apr 2015, 14:32 · from 2015-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 10:32:17 -0400
Subject: (urth) Latro
In-Reply-To: <0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D02DAD4 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>
References: <BLU175-W457D05A9460CB6AD82A265CFEC0 at phx.gbl>	<CAJ8=rtgT=aWWuneq+7VZ2b6UuUh1S-xtZQGE7TyV58sFHJ66YA at mail.gmail.com>
	<0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D02DAD4 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>
Message-ID: <553CF6F1.4040304 at verizon.net>

And no one is more gossipy than "the gays." Worse than a houseful of wives!

On 4/24/2015 4:08 PM, Norwood, Frederick Hudson wrote:
>
> Yes, Paul has an anti-gay statement.  He says that gays are as bad as 
> gossips!
>
> Rick
>
> *From:*Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] *On Behalf Of *Dan'l 
> Danehy-Oakes
> *Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2015 2:38 PM
> *To:* The Urth Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: (urth) Latro
>
> Actually, there is one notable anti-gay statement in the NT, but it's 
> Paul, not Jesus.
>
> And you're right to wonder how many wives the Sanhedrin might have 
> had; Paul says that an elder (presbyter, priest) should have only one.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Lee <severiansola at hotmail.com 
> <mailto:severiansola at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >Dan'l Danehy-Oakes: Not to be argumentative, but, no, Jesus' ministry 
> was *not* an attack on
> >Judaism; to the extent that it was an attack at all, it was an attack on
> >the hypocrisy of the priestly class. But Jesus did not see himself as
> >destroying Judaism ("...not one jot or tittle of the Law shall be taken
> >away...") but fulfilling it.
>
>
> I won't take it as argument but as a point of discussion. It wasn't 
> the main point of my post, so
>
> I didn't elaborate. But in fairness I didn't just say "Judaism", I  said:
>
>
>
> >Jesus' ministry was an attack on the prevailing Judaic religion of 
> his time.
>
>
>
> By which I meant the practice of Judaism as administered by the 
> priestly class of Judea. The
>
> Sanhedrin made it clear they weren't happy with Jesus' ministry and 
> considered it a threat. Even
>
> today, there are certain Christians AND Jews who deny Jesus was jewish.
>
>
>
> I think there were times when the words of Jesus imply he considered 
> his goal to be bringing
>
> back a lost purity to Judaism. Though the Old Testament consistently 
> implies that the Hebrews were
>
> a constant disappointment to God. (small wonder that guilt is an 
> important part of being jewish ;- ))
>
>
>
> But other times Jesus seemed to acknowledge that he was bringing 
> something new to the table
>
> (even if fulfilling ancient prophecy). For some reason Luke 12:51 and 
> Matthew 10-34 come to mind,
>
> where Jesus notes that he has not come to bring peace but rather 
> division and a sword- setting family
>
> members against each other, etc.
>
>
>
> I take this as a, if not transparent, then translucent way of Jesus 
> saying that he expected his ministry
>
> to create divisions between the jews who were doing things the current 
> way vs. those planning to follow
>
> Jesus and how he expected things to be done differently in the future.
>
>
>
> What changes were expected? No more "eye for an eye, tooth for a 
> tooth" but rather "turn the other cheek"
>
> to use the oft-cited example.  There are quite a few homophobic 
> statements, acceptance of polygamy,
>
> glorification of war, use of maiming and dismemberment as legal 
> punshments, etc. in the Old Testament,
>
> but not in the New Testament.
>
>
>
> So I have to wonder how many wives those Judean priests had......
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net