Latro

Norwood, Frederick Hudson · 27 Apr 2015, 17:13 · from 2015-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu (Norwood, Frederick Hudson)
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:13:18 +0000
Subject: (urth) Latro
In-Reply-To: <BLU175-W136103A1EA4EE6956642BECFE90 at phx.gbl>
References: <BLU175-W136103A1EA4EE6956642BECFE90 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D02DD38 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>

I no longer go to church, but when I did the sermons were mostly about the importance for Christians to always vote for the Republican party.  I remember one sermon about the camel passing through the eye of a needle.  The preacher explained that "the eye of a needle" was the name of the gate that the rich used to enter Jerusalem and so the point of the parable is that naturally the rich would use that gate to enter heaven. 

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Lee
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 1:08 PM
To: urth at urth.net
Subject: (urth) Latro

>Dan'l Danehy-Oakes: Lee,  Jesus' concern/love for the poor/common man was actually a 

>continuation/ confirmation of what several of the Prophets in the Old Testament had said 

>on the subject.

Sure, of course. Makes sense.

>It would not be at all accurate to say that Second Temple Judaism was centered on "reverence for 

>wealth, power, and inherited social status." Indeed, the Law made a number of exceptions, especially 

>in the matter of required sacrifices, for the poor.

Not to be argumentative, but as you note, these were "exceptions" for the poor. Meaning the general

rule was that sacrificing a portion of your wealth WAS an essential part of being a good jew, at the time.

And who got that portion of your wealth? The ruling class of the priesthood.

Concomitantly, if the admiration of personal wealth and power and status wasn't an important part of 

Judaic religion at the time, why would Jesus spend so much time preaching against it, especially the role

of the priestly castes? 

Aren't such things a part of human nature? Don't we still hear sermons against worshipping money and 

power?  I can't imagine that Judean Hebrews were so different about that than everyone else, including 

we of modern society.

I suspect we are not really in disagreement on this issue. Perhaps it is only a matter of how things are 

worded. 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net