Short Story 125*: Sightings at Twin Mounds
Marc Aramini · 27 Apr 2015, 20:09
· from 2015-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: marcaramini at gmail.com (Marc Aramini) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:09:29 -0700 Subject: (urth) Short Story 125*: Sightings at Twin Mounds Message-ID: <CAF1072yDvUVBt4Ro3orWfT+-SKQk483hMKdhGpW7uE1dok+yNg at mail.gmail.com> #SIGHTINGS AT TWIN MOUNDS Inverting the usual order of things, ?Sightings at Twin Mounds? was first collected in Wolfe's 1988 collection *Storeys from the Old Hotel* ? though it was reprinted in the 1996 themed anthology *UFOs: The Greatest Stories*. #Summary: The story does not follow a traditional narrative, instead representing a collation of supposedly objective sources to narrate the events in question: ?This puzzling case presents several unique features; because it is of more than ordinary interest, I shall quote several of the documents in full.? The first article, which attracted the narrator's attention, is a news snippet entitled ?UFOs Spotted Over Park? and mentions the brilliant blue and white lights over Indian River State Park in Duke County (certainly set near Rochester, New York or possibly New England, conceivably near the Canadian border, though probably entirely fictional) which residents often see after midnight, with several hundred people witnessing the lights. When police were dispatched to investigate the lights, they found an incoherent man there. Then, the narrator includes the description of the (most certainly fictional) Indian River area which includes many mounds, including Eagle Mound, Twin Mounds, and Snake Mounds. ?An Algonquin legend has it that the site commemorates a raid on an Algonquin village by Iroquois, in which all the Algonquins perished with the exception of the chiefs daughter, who fled into the forest pursued by the Iroquois warparty. Encountering the wendigo, she begged it to defend her.? The two were killed, and their remains interred under Twin Mounds. The entry ends with, ?This legend may arise from the similarity of the hemispherical mounds to a woman's breasts.? The narrator then includes an encyclopedia entry describing a wendigo, an ogre in the mythology of some northeastern tribes - ?Hunters lost in the forest without food are thought to turn cannibal and, through the effects of eating human flesh, become wendigo, fearsome enemies of human beings possessing great strength and appearing and vanishing at will.? The narrator requests copies of the *Colbyville Courier*, noting ?several carried half-jocular stories concerning moving lights and 'giant spaceships' hovering over Indian River State Park?, but quoting only appropriate parts. One article details the man found unconscious, Stanley J. Robakowski, who was admitted to the hospital and was not truly considered to be responsible for the lights: ?Several witnesses stated emphatically that they had observed moving lights above the trees after police departed with Mr. Robakowski in custody.? The narrator looks up Robakowski's information and is certain that he is a ?contactee? of aliens or UFOs. By the time he arrives in Colbyville, Robakowski has been discharged from the hospital. The narrator manages to arrange a meeting with Robakowski over the phone, but cannot find his way to the apartment in the rain, calling to arrange another meeting for the next night when he returns to his hotel. ?With a day to kill in Colbyville?, the narrator visits the park and talks to people who had seen the lights. ?They were described as very bright, usually white or blue-white, but occasionally yellow. ?One informant stated they proceeded from what she termed a 'wingless airplane' ? that is to say, a torpedo-shaped flying object.? He drives to find Robakowski's apartment, which is actually the upper story of an old house, and sees the shadow of an embracing couple on the curtains. He decides to wait and telephones from a nearby cafe. When he returns, he notices that the door was ajar. After ringing, he enters and finds blood all over the kitchen, bedroom and hall, then calls the police at once, though he states no arrest was ever made. The doctor who treated Robakowski publishes his account of his stay at the hospital in *The Journal of the American Psychiatric Society*, using the pseudonym Stan Roland to identify Robakowski (though both names in the various objective sources are described as belonging to a man employed at a paper mill). Roland is described as exhibiting neither hostility nor aggression and as having no history of psychopathic or psychoneurotic disturbance. Having come to the park with friends to see if they would witness the lights, he saw a dim blue light moving in the area of the Twin Mounds, but others did not believe him. Roland climbed the fence of the park and claimed that the trails he had known since boyhood had vanished, being almost free of underbrush. He saw moving blue and white lights but could not approach them. >At this point, Roland invariably became agitated, and the order of subjective events is unclear. ?She ran into me in the dark.? ?I thought I heard somebody screaming off to my right ? there was a lot of yelling, and all of a sudden this girl was holding onto me.? ?I was just walking along, trying to go fast, you know? And all of a sudden my arms were around her.? There is no objective evidence for the existence of this mysterious young woman, who Roland said could not speak English and seemed terrified. They run, assaulted by invisible beings. Roland claimed he could see the young woman but could not see their attackers, ?who were thus tactile and auditory hallucinations only.? He says that they became separated, but still feels as if ?they and she were still searching for him.? The young woman called something that sounded like ?Where'd he go?? ?He said that neither she nor those who had attacked them could see him now; nor could he see them.? The narrator concludes by saying that UFO contactees have often felt that they were shadowed or threatened, ?most frequently by *men in black (MIBs).* Physical harm at their hands are rare, ?and murder almost unheard-of; and yet murder would appear to have taken place in the mysterious case of Stanley J. Robakowski.? More sightings have been sparse and difficult to verify, but two years ago an archeological excavation of Twin Mounds was begun, but ?All activity was suspended indefinitely when it was discovered that the site had been contaminated by ?modern materials.? ##Commentary: ###I. An Incidental Displacement ?Sighting at Twin Mounds? is presented as a series of reports and supposedly objective source stories. According to Wolfe's introduction to *Storeys from the Old Hotel, *this framing technique came about in the following fashion: >"'Sightings at Twin Mounds' was written last year as a sort of experiment ... From time to time, no reading gives me more pleasure than supposedly factual accounts of UFOs, black dogs, vanishing hitchhikers, and similar apparitions, although all such accounts are ultimately unsatisfactory. (I recommend *Sasquatch: the Apes Among Us*, by John Green, should you ever come across a copy.) It seems to me that a good, and indeed entirely satisfactory story could be written in that style. It is a framed story, if you like, in which the frame is the whole story; and if you like it, that makes two of us." The concept of John Green's book involves a series of objective reports and interviews to get a complete picture of the phenomenon, with the evidence presented logically. This is clearly the inspiration for the structure of the short story, which uses small snippets to paint a larger picture (from which the narrator and collator seems unable to draw a final conclusion which should be fairly obvious.) While some readers assert that Wolfe's narrators lie assiduously, I have always believed that for the most part we are given the truth, unless it contradicts some other bit of information or forms an identifiable, if subtle, pattern. For example, when Marsch says that he could not write because of the cat bite in *The Fifth Head of Cerberus's* final novella, he might be actually telling the truth, but in a way that we could not have anticipated on our first reading before we understand that the Shadow child infection thrives in the saliva of the mouth. When the narrator of many portions of *The Book of the Short Sun* denies being Silk, he does so as a psychological defense mechanism that is readily ascertainable: Silk would not admit that his student Horn has died to bring him back, and as long as he can hold on to Horn's memories, it is a way to keep his student alive. Subsequently, I am reluctant to identify information as a red herring or a useless lead without an extremely compelling narrative hint that this is actually the case. The story features flashing lights, time travel, the corruption of an Indian word, and the factual, objective structure inspired by Green's book, in addition to descriptions of the alien cylinders by supposedly objective witnesses. The interpretation which uses the most of these features is the standard reading: Stan Robakowski is caught by the blue and yellow lights that are formed when unidentified flying objects travel at extreme speeds above Twin Mounds, and, caught in the wake of their super fast displacement through space, is accidentally displaced in time temporarily (when the underbrush disappears), where he forms a deep union with the young Indian girl. He seems to be stuck in a kind of phase shift joining the two times together. Stan and the young girl are attacked by the Indians which they cannot see, which ?Stan Roland? describes as ?tactile and auditory hallucinations.? The union they form leads to a joint occupation of past and present, as he feels he is still being hunted. When the pull finally creates another conjunction, our narrator sees Stan and the Iroquois girl embracing on the window before they are pulled inexorably back into the past and are buried together under Twin Mounds, to become the legend (and the modern contaminants). If we assume that the lights represent the movement of alien ships, the redshift/blueshift spectrum and doppler effect allows us to guess that these ships actually emit green light: they would appear blue as they are approaching at extreme speeds, and appear yellow as they are leaving (green is situated between these two in wavelength). Thus, it is their passage which explains the displacement of space and time and winds up resulting in Stan's remains buried in the past as the ?wendigo? (which he hears as ?Where'd he go??when the girl says it) and introducing modern material under the hill, such as his clothes or any artifacts of contemporary consumer technology he carried upon him at the time. This reading firmly places the story as a science fiction story in which UFOs incidentally create a vortex in time, possibly unintentionally via the wake of their passage, but at least one other interpretation favors an extremely unreliable narrator bent on cannibalism. ###II. Framing the UFOs Though I do not necessarily endorse the following reading, available on the WolfeWiki, Robert Pirkola's recreation of events involves the concept of a murderous narrator who is attracted to Stanley Robakowski as a ?contactee? and potential victim for his cannibalistic tendencies, and there are at least two metatextual statements that are offhandedly ominous. The first is the narrator's statement that he had ?a day to kill in Colbyville?, which is the kind of double entendre Wolfe enjoys at times. The second is less ominous but conceivably more remorseful: ?No doubt I should not have done what I did,? though of course by the surface reading he is simply stating he should not have entered someone's house - rather than saying that he should not have eaten them for dinner (or breakfast). Under Pirkola's timeline, the narrator comes across the newspaper clipping from the United Press Wire Service while Stan Robakowski is still at St. Joseph's hospital, and, his interest piqued, orders recent copies of the *Colbyville Courier*. After he travels to Colbyville, he arranges a meeting, and rather than being unable to find the apartment, prevents the duplex door from locking (open in anticipation of his arrival) and then phones Robakowski to say that he could not find it. Pirkola's recreation involves the narrator returning that night or in the early morning of the next day, killing Robakowski, and dragging him from the bedroom down the hallway into the kitchen (where he eats him) to account for the trail of blood found there. He also takes Stanley's personal effects to later bury at Twin Mounds. The yellow lights the narrator notes as being reported are, in this case, the headlights of his car going to the park. Pirkola makes the following claims: >The narrator only felt safe enough to report the event more than two years later, after he had kept tabs on whether anyone had been arrested for the murder. In a final bid to mislead would-be investigators, he plants the idea that MIBs may have been involved. ...The narrator's interest was first attracted by the fact that there was an incoherent man found near a site of possible supernatural happenings. This opens the door to occult explanations for such a man's disappearance and the opportunity to feed without notice. Not only are there apparently extraterrestrial/supernatural goings-on near an occult site, but there is an interesting legend attached to the area that the cannibal narrator can later appropriate and use to distract future investigators. The narrator only feels sure that Robakowski was a "contactee", which is to say a potential meal, after gathering information about the occult nature of the event and confirming that Robakowski had been psychiatrically hospitalized at St. Joseph's for at least 5 days. In further discussion online at the Urth Mailing List, Pirkola elaborates: >It is important to remember that this particular victim is merely one of many in a presumably longer career of the narrator/cannibal. This is alluded to in the beginning of the story which starts out as though it were one tale in a collection of supernatural/extraterrestrial encounters assembled by the narrator. "This puzzling case presents several unique features . . ." The features are unique because they distinguish this case from the other omitted examples in the collection, each of which might presumably also relate an incident where the narrator engaged in cannibalism and used the supernatural circumstances as cover. Later on, he also states "Here I must confess my own shortcoming -- one I regret more than any other involving UFO studies." The narrator is not a person that collects U.F.O. clippings first and foremost who then subsequently develops the desire to consume human flesh, but is instead a cannibal who has taken an interest in the supernatural/extraterrestrial because he recognizes an opportunity to feed undetected in modern society by victimizing those whose disappearance will be subsumed in the fringe culture of the occult. It would not be strange for a confirmed cannibal to be looking for "random guys to eat", because that is precisely the life a cannibal would have to lead. The most difficult questions a modern cannibal would have to face are: whom shall I eat? and how shall I get away with it serially? Our narrator has found one (admittedly imperfect, but not bad) answer to these questions. It is likewise important to remember that we must take the narrator's word that the sources he claims to be quoting are being quoted accurately and have not been altered or, for that matter, are not made up out of whole cloth. The psychiatric account of "Stan Roland", which we have only the narrator's word was a pseudonym of Mr. Robakowski's, for example, is supposed to have been written by Dr. Ernest Schwartz. Of course, Ernest=earnest=serious and Schwartz is German for "black" and so we have "serious black", or more particularly, a Man In Black (MIB). This is exactly the type of name a person who spends a great deal of time researching U.F.O. phenomena would concoct. Therefore, I think the theory at least admits the possibility that all of the supernatural/extraterrestrial experiences of Robakowski are made up by the narrator to tie together the disoriented Robakowski of the newspaper reports with the legend of the mounds, the girl, and the wendigo. .... >In the [original cannibal] analysis, I claimed these different colored lights might have been the narrator's headlights from when he visited the mounds to bury Robakowski's "modern materials". I think it more likely that since the park closes at six p.m. and may be surrounded by a fence (though the circumferential nature of the fence comes from "Dr. Schwartz" so, grain of salt) that the yellow lights were in fact the narrator's "four-cell flashlight" which he would have used to find his way to the mounds.Another point in the story that seems to support the original theory, but can also be explained by my own, again comes from the "Dr. Schwartz" report. Robakowski is supposed to have related that when the trails he was familiar with disappeared "the heavily wooded area was, paradoxically, almost free of underbrush, which is not in fact the case." This would correspond to being transported to a time when Native Americans predominated because they were, by all accounts, great husbandmen of the forest, clearing the underbrush by the use of fire and other means. This improved their ability to see the distance (important for spotting invaders) and allowed for the selection of useful plants to the exclusion of others. In fact, the "wilderness forest" that we think of today is much more a tangled mess than it had been before the arrival of Europeans to the North American continent. Thus, Robakowski's description would be highly accurate. However, Robakowski is said to have visited the park frequently in his childhood. This fascination with park would likely have led him to look into the history of the area and he probably would have been familiar enough with the wendigo folklore and the Native American history of the area to concoct the accurately detailed story related in the "Dr. Schwartz" report. We are therefore presented with three alternatives for the psychiatric account: (1) it is made up by the narrator as detailed above, or (2) Robakowski himself falsified the story which was then repeated by Dr. Schwartz, or (3) Robakowski actually had the experience. In my mind, the third alternative is the most quotidian sf reading and removes much of the depth I would generally associate with a Gene Wolfe story. I doubt Mr. Wolfe would express the satisfaction with the story he did in the Introduction to *Storeys from the Old Hotel* if it was as simple as a first reading would make it seem. It also was written in 1987, so his skills at creating depth of meaning (as most potently expressed in TBOTNS) were already masterful. Finally, I think the keystone of my theory lies in the Introduction: "It is a framed story, if you like, in which the frame is the whole story." The "frame" is not just the framing device but the fact that the entire story is the narrator framing the U.F.O.s for the murder/disappearance of Robakowski. (Pirkola) I will merely reiterate here that in explications of Wolfe which I think have a kernel of authorial intention in them, usually previously seemingly unrelated details can come into a kind of startling new light (something which I found to be true upon realizing that the Americans were planning to use the corrupted grain to attack the other nations of the world ? thus all the talk of scents in ?Seven American Nights?, or upon realizing that Pete Palmer was in fact a changeling in the story of the same name). Pirkola's explanation makes sense of the blood stains and the cannibalistic reference in regards to the wendigo (which is after all an Algonquin concept for someone who can also appear and vanish at will, which Stanley must seem to be doing to the woman), but it tends to treat the alien theme and the witness description of the ?wingless airplane? as complete fabrication. ##Names: -*Stanley*: The name Stanley means ?stone clearing?, derived from an Old English surname. Robakowski appears to be a Polish family name. The pseudonym *Roland* implies ?famous?. -*Ernest Schwartz*: Ernest means ?determined? and Schwartz is a German/Yiddish name meaning ?dark? or ?black?. The names do not seem to have much bearing on this particular story, though Pirkola emphasizes the connection of Dr. Schwartz's name with the concept of the Men in Black. -*Colbyville*: Since it is probably a fictional park and city, it is worth looking at the meaning of this city name - ?from the dark city or farm?. ##Connection with other works: The fatal embrace across time that Stan Robakowski and the young Indian girl enjoy clearly echoes the wrestling of Severian and Apu-Punchau, a possibly consubstantial union that transcends temporality. The interposition of a series of mysteries through objective sources and the incorrect conclusion of our purveyor of curiosities is typical of Wolfe (?Reports of physical harm at the hands of MIBs are extremely rare, and murder almost unheard-of; and yet murder would appear to have taken place in the mysterious case of Stanley J. Robakowksi?). Our narrator presents all the information and even has a first hand account, but fails to draw the obvious conclusion ? that Stanley's trip backwards through time is some kind of natural resonance rather than an intentional murder. Robert Pirkola's explanation does have some metatextual merit, but I am not certain that we should write off such a large portion of the story in favor of an extremely subtle hint of cannibalism, evidence which includes drawings and descriptions of the UFOs as well as a scientific explanation for the changing color of the light ? the ships approaching and then leaving at great speeds. The Wolfe irony is still in effect even without the diabolical narrator, for this seeker of accounts of mysteries and UFO phenomenon never comes to the obvious conclusion even given all his data and compilation. Almost always, the science fictional/fantastic explanation is favored over the psychotic reading (though in stories such as ?Josh?, ?Mute?, and *The Sorcerer's House*, a clear preference of science or fantasy over psychosis is very hard to assert confidently. ?Beech Hill?, ?Melting?, and perhaps ?Suzanne Delage? are general exceptions where the proper reading seems to be one of low mimesis couched in realism). This seems to be another one of Wolfe's ?mysterious light? stories, which were written near the same time and include ?Slow Children at Play? and ?The Friendship Light.? These three stories explore the same light from a religious, a supernatural or horrific, and (for ?Sightings at Twin Mounds) a scientific viewpoint. ##Resources -Pirkola, Robert. ?Sighting at Twin Mounds.? Urth Mailing List. 20 June 2014. Web. 26 April 2015. http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2014-June/054851.html -?Sighting at Twin Mounds.? Wolfe Wiki. 28 May 2014. Web. 25 April 2015. http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Stories.SightingsAtTwinMounds -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20150427/1253dba9/attachment-0001.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net