Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Puppies

Norwood, Frederick Hudson · 29 Apr 2015, 15:50 · from 2015-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu (Norwood, Frederick Hudson)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:50:02 +0000
Subject: (urth) Puppies
In-Reply-To: <5A7C4A97-09EC-4EA5-BFBA-C3D034D65A2C at gmail.com>
References: <BAY172-W252ADC1EC8B8BC1D3F5D5FDFD70 at phx.gbl>
	<5A7C4A97-09EC-4EA5-BFBA-C3D034D65A2C at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D02E212 at ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>

You live in a place where conservatism is unfashionable.  I am a liberal who lives in a place where liberalism is unfashionable (Tennessee).  But when it comes to, for example, Wolfe and Pournelle, I think those words are misleading.  Wolfe is a religious conservative, and has a very dim view of government in general.  If Pournelle is religious, he hasn't mentioned it, and he has often worked for the government.  If this discussion is going to make any sense at all, we need to distinguish between social conservatives (anti-gay, anti-abortion, War on Christmas conservatives) and libertarians such as Pournelle, who have allied with the Republican Party in the US but must find themselves in bed with some really strange bedfellows.

More important is the question to what extent politics influences their fiction.  Pournelle's fiction is, of course, all about politics, but I enjoy it anyway.  I enjoy Wolfe less when he puts too much politics into his fiction, as I think he did in The Land Across.  I've read all of Vinge, enjoyed it all, and didn't even know he was right-wing.  I still don?t know what tail of the Right he is on.

But I don't like the idea of people voting for the Hugo based on politics (or gender or race) instead of on how good the story is.  And I have noticed people complaining that they didn't win because of their politics (Spider Robinson is a good example) when really the problem was that the particular story wasn't good enough.

Rick  


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net