Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Interlibrary Loan

Eric Bourland · 27 Apr 2019, 02:51 · from 2019-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: eb at hwaet.com (Eric Bourland)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:51:18 -0400
Subject: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
In-Reply-To: <CAF1072wKgr53Lg5hcjQOvfksPa3c3iaQ791qR9DorKyRky9c-g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGoL=DCd+q=2w+N7ZY=g4u+t6HgyG0vPUWUh+Jp9+kM3fT_EMA at mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHXB04XssmLjJnvin-Avmv8bswCcCHTRE72LTHGY+CZUk-ytjQ at mail.gmail.com>
 <33AC9BEC-54E3-4293-BE5E-1771E639D946 at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072wiN4yJKG4dJ1+QxoJHPkQdtk24=jnNzubEX1v8Fgp6MA at mail.gmail.com>
 <E6682F03-0ACA-4E50-868F-9AD8191FE2AF at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072y4Eo9YS5_deNL8o4_cqc3hh-38qrvC+9GACEf-qreZrA at mail.gmail.com>
 <CADuJ4s_cDjyU2X7Y4VfbeqNtETxkvLcM9fEPYDMeS72rgVVVCw at mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF1072wKgr53Lg5hcjQOvfksPa3c3iaQ791qR9DorKyRky9c-g at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <00e501d4fca4$172fed40$458fc7c0$@hwaet.com>

I am wondering what result we would get if, individually and noisily, we reached out to Tor editors and implored them to do basic proofreading on the new novel, but make no changes in its substance, and publish it as Mr. Wolfe wrote it. I am willing to act on this.

 

Eric

 

 

 

*******

Eric Bourland

eb at hwaet.com

https://www.hwaet.com/

 

 

From: Urth <urth-bounces at lists.urth.net> On Behalf Of Marc Aramini
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 8:25 PM
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Interlibrary Loan

 

One hopes. Yes that?s how I feel about those who would edit Wolfe.he can create meaning in so many ways that every reader will certainly miss, especially in his post 2000 work.  

(I?m glad cell phones made top posting the de facto response - I remember the days of the list when it was a sin.) I have always preferred it. 

On Friday, April 26, 2019, Evan Pickett <picketter at gmail.com <mailto:picketter at gmail.com> > wrote:

I'm reminded of a scene from The Insider, although Mr. Wolfe would probably not ever take this tone:

 <https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/724e8b4b-0515-48cf-b7f2-e49501158ca4> https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/724e8b4b-0515-48cf-b7f2-e49501158ca4

 

Surely any editor would know by now that Gene Wolfe chose his words with care?

 

Best,

Evan

 

 

 

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:48 PM Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com <mailto:marcaramini at gmail.com> > wrote:

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20190426/40681b83/attachment.html>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net