Interlibrary Loan

Marc Aramini · 28 Apr 2019, 15:22 · from 2019-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at gmail.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 08:22:19 -0700
Subject: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
In-Reply-To: <CAF1072wCxMtkzMuYFrHPq0nitxsD9Lu_qGxVEP+8C3MQ+opF6g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGoL=DCd+q=2w+N7ZY=g4u+t6HgyG0vPUWUh+Jp9+kM3fT_EMA at mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHXB04XssmLjJnvin-Avmv8bswCcCHTRE72LTHGY+CZUk-ytjQ at mail.gmail.com>
 <33AC9BEC-54E3-4293-BE5E-1771E639D946 at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072wiN4yJKG4dJ1+QxoJHPkQdtk24=jnNzubEX1v8Fgp6MA at mail.gmail.com>
 <E6682F03-0ACA-4E50-868F-9AD8191FE2AF at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072y4Eo9YS5_deNL8o4_cqc3hh-38qrvC+9GACEf-qreZrA at mail.gmail.com>
 <CADuJ4s_cDjyU2X7Y4VfbeqNtETxkvLcM9fEPYDMeS72rgVVVCw at mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF1072wKgr53Lg5hcjQOvfksPa3c3iaQ791qR9DorKyRky9c-g at mail.gmail.com>
 <00e501d4fca4$172fed40$458fc7c0$@hwaet.com>
 <CAKYd2s2rA-SbDpGTuetDwNdoOacXCKXN6ZXy_WWHbkrt0ui0Lg at mail.gmail.com>
 <6B616C3C-C275-419F-9159-C5CF4723F3A0 at bellsouth.net>
 <CAF1072wtrzOBXUjThvHoJgxoQJM=g0UA0UjJVZuqr2=vSn1ttw at mail.gmail.com>
 <e37aa6a2-5316-1639-b57d-6e2a8c27771e at casema.nl>
 <CAF1072wCxMtkzMuYFrHPq0nitxsD9Lu_qGxVEP+8C3MQ+opF6g at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAF1072xJCvtaMGPGTNRM7GvPqOvCxf8DJrOCV+JjuhugVWjCMA at mail.gmail.com>

scribner- autocorrect is an odious presence most of the time

On Sunday, April 28, 2019, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes it was fixed for the ace but all subsequent printings used the
> scrubber text
>
> On Sunday, April 28, 2019, Ab de Vos <foxyab at casema.nl> wrote:
>
>> I have the Charles Scribner's Sons edition of Fifth Head (New York,
>> 1972). Is that one corrupted as well?
>> Op 28-4-2019 om 01:16 schreef Marc Aramini:
>>
>> Copy editors managed to mess up the horn reveal in reprints of Long Sun
>> and I insist the ace version of Fifth Head is the least corrupt. Wolfe was
>> very mad about the switching of horn for I about two thirds of the way
>> through exodus in reprints. He wanted the reveal at that dinner scene.
>>
>> On Saturday, April 27, 2019, PAUL RYDEEN <rydeen at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I've never been sure how much leeway an editor really has. Would they
>>> really cut whole scenes they didn't like?  Do they redo things wholesale or
>>> just fix things and make recommendations?   Since Wolfe picked this editor,
>>> can we rely on his pick?  Even if Wolfe were alive, how much of the
>>> editor's influence would make it to publication?  And if the answer is the
>>> editor has a lot of sway, how many of his edits would the author notice on
>>> review?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 9:55 PM, Bailey Swartz <bsswartz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I like to have faith that Wolfe (who so carefully constructed each work)
>>> anticipated the possibility of posthumourous publication and made
>>> appropriate plans for that eventuality.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:51 PM Eric Bourland <eb at hwaet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am wondering what result we would get if, individually and noisily,
>>>> we reached out to Tor editors and implored them to do basic proofreading on
>>>> the new novel, but make no changes in its substance, and publish it as Mr.
>>>> Wolfe wrote it. I am willing to act on this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *******
>>>>
>>>> Eric Bourland
>>>>
>>>> eb at hwaet.com
>>>>
>>>> https://www.hwaet.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Urth <urth-bounces at lists.urth.net> *On Behalf Of *Marc Aramini
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 26, 2019 8:25 PM
>>>> *To:* The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One hopes. Yes that?s how I feel about those who would edit Wolfe.he
>>>> can create meaning in so many ways that every reader will certainly miss,
>>>> especially in his post 2000 work.
>>>>
>>>> (I?m glad cell phones made top posting the de facto response - I
>>>> remember the days of the list when it was a sin.) I have always preferred
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, April 26, 2019, Evan Pickett <picketter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm reminded of a scene from The Insider, although Mr. Wolfe would
>>>> probably not ever take this tone:
>>>>
>>>> https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/724e8b4b-0515-48cf-b7f2-e49501158ca4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Surely any editor would know by now that Gene Wolfe chose his words
>>>> with care?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Evan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:48 PM Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20190428/11288c5c/attachment.html>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net