Interlibrary Loan
John Barach · 28 Apr 2019, 22:59
· from 2019-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jbarach at aol.com (John Barach)
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
References: <1277801494.1810872.1556492348057.ref at mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1277801494.1810872.1556492348057 at mail.yahoo.com>
You do point out all the typos, etc., you've been able to catch in your book, right, Marc?? (I hope!? I think I gave away my Ace Fifth Head?when I got a shiny new one, unfortunately.)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com>
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
Sent: Sun, Apr 28, 2019 4:02 pm
Subject: Re: (urth) Interlibrary Loan
Yes every edition but the Ace uses the Scribner flawed printing.?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 1:58 PM PAUL RYDEEN <rydeen at bellsouth.net> wrote:
The Gollancz SF Masterworks ebook has "fifteen" (spelled out). ?
On Apr 28, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:
See page 161- ?it must have weighed a good fifteen pounds? - I have had translators contact me and had to explain it should be fifteen hundred pounds.?
On Sunday, April 28, 2019, Ab de Vos <foxyab at casema.nl> wrote:
I have the Charles Scribner's Sons edition of Fifth Head (New York, 1972). Is that one corrupted as well? Op 28-4-2019 om 01:16 schreef Marc Aramini:
Copy editors managed to mess up the horn reveal in reprints of Long Sun and I insist the ace version of Fifth Head is the least corrupt. Wolfe was very mad about the switching of horn for I about two thirds of the way through exodus in reprints. He wanted the reveal at that dinner scene.?
On Saturday, April 27, 2019, PAUL RYDEEN <rydeen at bellsouth.net> wrote:
I've never been sure how much leeway an editor really has. Would they really cut whole scenes they didn't like?? Do they redo things wholesale or just fix things and make recommendations? ? Since Wolfe picked this editor, can we rely on his pick?? Even if Wolfe were alive, how much of the editor's influence would make it to publication?? And if the answer is the editor has a lot of sway, how many of his edits would the author notice on review?
On Apr 26, 2019, at 9:55 PM, Bailey Swartz <bsswartz at gmail.com> wrote:
I like to have faith that Wolfe (who so carefully constructed each work) anticipated the possibility of posthumourous publication and made appropriate plans for that eventuality.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:51 PM Eric Bourland <eb at hwaet.com> wrote:
I am wondering what result we would get if, individually and noisily, we reached out to Tor editors and implored them to do basic proofreading on the new novel, but make no changes in its substance, and publish it as Mr. Wolfe wrote it. I am willing to act on this. ? Eric ? ? ? ******* Eric Bourland eb at hwaet.com https://www.hwaet.com/ ? ? From: Urth <urth-bounces at lists.urth.net> On Behalf Of Marc Aramini
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 8:25 PM
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Interlibrary Loan ? One hopes. Yes that?s how I feel about those who would edit Wolfe.he can create meaning in so many ways that every reader will certainly miss, especially in his post 2000 work. ? (I?m glad cell phones made top posting the de facto response - I remember the days of the list when it was a sin.) I have always preferred it.?
On Friday, April 26, 2019, Evan Pickett <picketter at gmail.com> wrote:
I'm reminded of a scene from The Insider, although Mr. Wolfe would probably not ever take this tone: https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/724e8b4b-0515-48cf-b7f2-e49501158ca4 ? Surely any editor would know by now that Gene Wolfe chose his words with care? ? Best, Evan ? ? ? On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:48 PM Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:
?
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20190428/df37b6a6/attachment.html>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net